The Durov case is clear evidence that when there is centralization, there are more possibilities for censorship and attack. Durov is being investigated for alleged crimes committed in Telegram, interesting that the accusation made in July was anonymous, how convenient. It is then up to him to prove that the accusations are true or false and that it was Durov who is responsible for the crimes or it was Telegram, the Telegram team.
Nostr cannot be attacked like this. It is a protocol, FoS, with different amounts of relays and types of clients. So who could you accuse, imprison, prosecute, block or censor?
Let's use the safest, most private and decentralized, only then will we be calmer
this territory is moderated
That's why anonymity is as important as privacy.
reply