I just want to know why. If I wanted staking and PoS then I wouldn't use a PoW blockchain!
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @eduardopro 1 Sep
Scam 100%.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Muuny 1 Sep
their coins are absolutely gone, yield is the best scam ever.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro 2 Sep
Exactly.
Poof... and it's gone.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 1 Sep
I don’t understand where the yield comes from or what you are actually accomplishing by staking. Are you using bitcoin to validate other chains? If that’s the case then other chains don’t need a native token. Not sure they are going to be thrilled about that.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Thereal 1 Sep
Read the Core Dao White paper it's possible
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BTCLNAT 1 Sep
In my humble opinion, this proposal is interesting.
"The only risk involved would be reducing the risk at the protocol level, if the validator you trust with your stake behaves dishonestly."
The article points out the benefits of blocking those BTC that are inactive. Then it would be accumulating and blocking BTC, which generates profits. But how would it be, if the profit in Bitcoin is through mining or the market?
This proposal is very interesting!!!
reply