I do think the leaderboard, while I like it, has had a negative effect on big zapping and incentivized optimizing for rewards. Before stackers weren’t really aware of how many rewards they would get at the end of the day so they just went on about their day posting, commenting and zapping. I think they are more strategic now because they know zapping top content early will garner more rewards so they might zap more posts but less sats than before.
I also think there are a lot of new stackers around and it does take awhile to figure out it’s ok to zap a lot. It is good for the community and you will likely get it all back in zaps and rewards. I think it takes some time to be comfortable with that.
I also think territories had something to do with it. I need to ensure I have 100k sats in my wallet when it is time to pay the monthly territory fee. If the territory only brings in 20k sats revenue in a month then I need to set aside 80k sats over the month for the fee. Thats less sats I have to zap.
Do you think that the leaderboard may lead to a strategic downzapping? If someone is higher in the leaderboard and someone, placed down the list, downzaps the post/comments of former , could this lead to the latter to gain positions?
Perhaps it would be better to avoid the leaderboard and just get the surprise the following morning, based on your activity in SN. It would be more anonymous too.
reply
I haven’t given much thought to it but I am not sure one person downzapping your content would make a huge deal. Maybe you would get knocked down a spot.
reply
Great point on the leaderboard. Perhaps we can remove the estimates. I'd also like to reward more than 100 stackers per day.
reply
More than 100 would be nice if there are a lot of stackers no getting any rewards. It might encourage folks that pop in and make one or two comments to spend a bit more time on the site if they login and see they got a couple hundred sats in rewards.
reply
Yep, it currently creates a bit of a cliff to earning rewards which I think translates into a cap on growth.
reply
I agree 💯 We have scope for at least letting in 100 more stackers on the leaderboard.
reply