67 sats \ 7 replies \ @IamSINGLE 27 Aug \ on: Drained SN wallet, connected with NWC for send & lightning address for receive bitcoin
So, it's like we don't have the best solution. LNC has issues, now NWC is also having them.
Why don't we make SN wallet non custodial?
This is the point of testing things out. It's by reporting issues that things will iron out.
Why don't we make SN wallet non custodial?
What do you mean? This is exactly what is being done here by connecting to external (custodial or non custodial wallets).
reply
I mean SN creates a non custodial wallet of/on its own.
reply
That's a whole project on its own :) makes more sense to let people choose their preferred non-custodial wallet that have a dedicated team to develop it
reply
It doesn't work like that I'm afraid
reply
It can work like that but it's very hard. The mutiny team showed it's possible to make a self custodial LN wallet for the browser. But then they stopped because because they think it's too hard of a problem to solve at scale. So I guess their story is evidence for both things: it's technically possible but (arguably) not in a practical way
reply
Yep, this architecture is completely ass backwards.... history has proven that it's unsustainable for services to depend on reach into user systems where user systems are by nature less robust forms of infrastructure.
What's worse is there's 0 rationale behind it, it's driven by speculative compliance. The embodiment of the weak men create hard times meme.
The good news is this will eventually cause the pendulum to swing back even further in the right direction.
reply