pull down to refresh

140 sats \ 3 replies \ @Satosora 27 Aug \ on: Drained SN wallet, connected with NWC for send & lightning address for receive bitcoin
Is it working well? Is it easy to use compared to sn?
write
preview
410 sats \ 2 replies \ @south_korea_ln OP 27 Aug
NWC send is working great. No failed payments up to now. It feels the same as using the custodial wallet, maybe with a 1-2s difference for the payment to settle. Barely noticable.
reply
175 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 27 Aug
Same with me. I'm on my 3rd day now. I think NWC send is reliable and good to use. Likewise, lightning address has been flawless connected to my always on node. I have used it with Blixt also, and it works. The only issue is that Blixt is not always open and online. In that case the transfers are made when the wallet is opened and the channels are back online.
reply
120 sats \ 0 replies \ @Taft 27 Aug
Same for me. I had the same problem with NWC (using AlbyHub) receiving, so I connected NWC to send and Lightning address to receive. Until the timeout bug is fixed, this is how I will do it.
reply