Skybridge Capital founder Anthony Scaramucci was recently reported to have stated in an interview that Bitcoin is not yet a store of value (link below). This got me thinking, Is there something Scaramucci doesn’t quite get about Bitcoin? As a major Bitcoin investor has he not quite put in the required Proof Of Work? Isn’t Store of Value supposed to come first followed by Means of Exchange on Bitcoin’s adoption journey? Or maybe I’m the one that don’t quite get it yet.
I don’t get it why Scaramucci giving that statement, for me Bitcoin is store of value - digital property - peer to peer money and of course my save heaven!
reply