pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 24 Aug \ parent \ on: U.S. Bolsters Ukraine Amid Independence Day With Fresh Aid and Sanctions news
You are putting up strawmen rather than addressing the facts an issues I Have raised. Facts and issues you cannot refute. China and Russia signed a mutual support pact days before Putin invaded Ukraine The pact confirms mutual support for their claims toward Ukraine and Taiwan. If Ukraine falls, due to insufficient resistance from the 'west' then it is probable that Taiwan would be next.
write
preview
this territory is moderated
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TomK OP 24 Aug
Think of what Merkel Macron told the MSM about the Minsk treaty
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @TomK OP 24 Aug
Well, I guess with the Maidan coup they understood that UK/US were playing false
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 24 Aug
Can you respond to the facts and issues raised in the New Yorker article? It seems not.
China and Russia have entered a pact to challenge the West and Russia goes first invading Ukraine. Pending the result of the Ukraine excursion, Taiwan is next.
Speculation~ Trump will hand Ukraine to his handler Putin. China subsequently attempt to take Taiwan, if successful the US has lost its global hegemony and China is at least on an equal if not superior footing to Uncle Sam.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @TomK OP 24 Aug
if you study European history a little, you will automatically come across the English motto: keep the Germans down and the Russians out. this has been the exact policy for several centuries
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 24 Aug
I do not see how that is relevant to the current global power dynamics. Europe is no longer a significant player. US and China are the modern centres of power and the contest is between them.
You seem unable to respond ton the contemporary reality as it was reported in The New Yorker and has since unfolded.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @TomK OP 24 Aug
Would You please answer on the Maidan coup and the Minsk affair instead of referring to a magazine article which I oppose in any form?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 24 Aug
No, because you have not (and appear incapable of) justifying your arbitrary dismissal of The New Yorker as a credible source, therefore responding to any subsequent strawmen you throw out is not appropriate to the context of a fact based reasoned contest of ideas.
reply