What happened to the existential threat of 'human-caused climate change' boiling the Atlantic Ocean?
Record-high Atlantic Ocean temperatures were seen during the strong El Niño years of 2023-24. The sudden cooling in the Atlantic is perplexing to climate doomers, whose primary goal is to push fear in hopes of pressuring lawmakers to ban cow farts and petrol-burning engines, all to usher in a 'green' economy. The journos who push climate fear around the clock are potentially blinded by the woke/climate mind virus that is not rooted in reality.
So, all that global warming fear was just a fluke and is like the old fiasco of a damaged Ozone layer! NATURE is so big that it can easily mend itself. Man has no chance of damaging it.
When will everyone accept the might of Nature?
Only wrong thing that we are doing is cutting more tree. Otherwise everything is cool.
reply
Yes! You're definitely right! Nature is the biggest and everything that comes out of Earth can't be dangerous. I also don't like excessive deforestation. One for trees are beautiful and secondly for they absorb harmful compounds.
reply
Earth or nature needs space to survive. 18 freeway lanes don’t allow this (just a small example) So let’s defend our Mother space and let’s stop adding more CO2 👍🏼
reply
I've always looked at Global Warming as a temporary damage control by Nature. There's nothing on Earth that can damage Earth. All is because of Earth so Earth is bigger in every terms.
reply
Of course Earth will survive, the only thing that can damage her is a planet collision or some kind of star expansion. Anyway the thing we trying to keep is life on earth as we know it today. Animals plants and fungi. We can’t live (humans) without them (as comfortable as now) or even without to high temperature. (Our bodies can’t support above certain low levels of heat).
reply
Where is global warming? I can't see it anywhere. I can only feel pure Air.
reply
You must be living in the woods or over the mountains in the snow. Otherwise the temperatures were too high this year. But they made it look that the end is near was too funny.
reply
This year’s heat was intense, but the exaggerated doomsday predictions about the end being near were a bit over the top!
reply
Yupp right!
reply
There is no more snow in many mountains. I’m the alive proof of it
reply
I agree
reply
Climate scientists have long neglected the oceans. This has been a long standing complaint of geophysicists, because most of the Earth's surface heat is in the oceans, which makes them more important to understand than the atmosphere.
reply
Yes, absolutely right. They have been crying about the temperatures rising in te last century. But IMO, this has been this way for. There are cycles or temperature rising and cooling down and again rising and cooling down. You would have noticed that in precious few years we are getting more chilly winters than we used to have 10 or 20 years ago.
I'm sitting here in the lap of Himalyas and I can confirm you that no glaciers have melt. If they had melted, at least there would have been some kind of catastrophe in my region. But we didn't feel anything. instead, winters are getting cooler and summers are getting shortened by every year.
reply
That doesn't surprise me. I actually do work related to climate change and there shouldn't be dramatic effects on temperatures far from the arctic. Most warming is occurring in northern latitudes and during winter nights.
People don't realize that they're largely freaking out about warmer winter nights, in the places with the coldest winters.
reply
Don’t sharks 🦈 love cold water?
Cooling Atlantic Ocean will attract more sharks?
reply
Climate Scientists whom are in the pockets of certain masters are just dabbling into speculations. They are doing nothing to accurately say what really is happening in the world. They are charlatans whom are always baffled whenever their calculations are wrong. They are baffled that the propaganda that they are propagating is being countered by real world measurements. They are doing that to shun public scrutiny as to why they they are always wrong as if they are useless in the real world. They are trapped by the theories that they memorized in the University. They are paralyzed by their dogmatic talking points.
reply
They don’t use scientific methods. They use computer models and simulations that are similar with too many variables to hack p values and correlation coefficients
reply
There is a reason why since the 1970s they keep changing the narrative from global cooling to global warming to now climate change because they have no clue what is going on but still want full control. Guess what they might take credit for the cooling by saying that their fear mongering paid off and the oceans are not boiling anymore
reply
When did climate change replace global warming? 2012?
reply
lol so you telling us that 8 billion people can’t change nature? I see that you are doing exactly the same as your friend Al gore, manipulation and generalization of data. Facts are that ocean are warming more and more each year as well as other climate change proofs : effects of ocean warming include sea level rise due to thermal expansion, coral bleaching, accelerated melting of Earth’s major ice sheets, intensified hurricanes and changes in ocean health and biochemistry. https://m.stacker.news/48052
reply
Cannot believe so many climate change deniers here.
What if you are wrong?
You will have allowed the destruction of the one and only planet that is just in the right zone to allow life to thrive.
The evidence of climate change is pretty strong if you read the science.
Every year has broken heat records this decade.
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @xz 24 Aug
I think the problem or part of, is how we are seduced into believing that we can only ever be in two camps. Climate change activists or climate change deniers. This is bogus.
Linguistic fallacies are precursors to binary thinking, false dichotomies and ultimately political and social manipulation. Pushing trigger buttons to divide and conquer through a controlled fabricated narrative, and outlawing of real debate.
Currently it is a specious debate. That is, apparent, seldom based on observation.
What grabs me specifically (in addition to all the anecdotal evidence) is that people's opinions are largely formed by media bias and the fact that their paycheck depends on them espousing the same data points. Data points which a re largely contestable and frequently are contested by looking a t wider data sets.
It's akin to trying to measure the circumfrence of the earth with a 15mm ruler and then doing the same thing every year to try to work out if it has changed.
reply
We have allowed the destruction of planet earth? I had no idea I possessed a super power
reply