pull down to refresh

I'm no fan of govt bureaucrats, but I think that is deliberately misunderstanding her.

To me, it reads pretty clearly she was saying "I'm not familiar with that report [from the BLS]" -- not that she hasn't heard of the BLS.

I agree.

It's still a huge story though. And the story is that the numbers are so shockingly made-up that the Bureau of Labor should be seen as about as trustworthy as Trump. And that's according to the Commerce Secretary

reply

After this nugget, I was ready to believe this new story too, but after seeing the clip, I think you're right. We don't get anywhere just quoting people out of context.

reply

No doubt the article might have shown a little bias there. The straight facts are damning enough.

reply

Fair enough, that's also how I read it, but she was somehow familiar with the fantasy that Trump was behind it.

reply