180 sats \ 11 replies \ @siggy47 19 Aug \ parent \ on: SN release: Blink sending wallet, and fixes for LNC, profiles, invoice retries meta
Yeah. That's important. It would kind of defeat the whole purpose 😀
write
preview
43 sats \ 10 replies \ @ek 19 Aug
Oh yeah, right, that probably wouldn't be considered non-custodial, haha
reply
151 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 19 Aug
I talked to another founder whose lawyers said it is non-custodial - legally at least. I think because you can unilaterally revoke their ability to spend on your behalf, and it's permissions to spend but you don't hold the money. Still, it's a honeypot. It's like storing credit card info.
reply
24 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 19 Aug
Interesting. The legal analysis sounds accurate, but who needs to push the boundaries in this environment?
reply
88 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 19 Aug
Yep, and storing any valuable data creates an incentive for someone to hack in to get it so it's best to avoid it.
reply
12 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 19 Aug
Yes. No brainer.
reply
135 sats \ 5 replies \ @siggy47 19 Aug
One more question. Can I change the wallet priority on mobile? Is it possible?
reply
43 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 19 Aug
Yes, if you click on a wallet, it should get dark and then you can click another wallet. The wallet will move to this position then.
reply
88 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 19 Aug
Aha! That's why the wallet goes dark. Thanks
reply
43 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 19 Aug
Would be fun if the wallets would act like tamagotchis and it going dark means it can rest now
reply
156 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 19 Aug
😀 BTW, it works great. Smooth.
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 19 Aug
Thank you :)
reply