pull down to refresh

SILENT PAYMENTS ARE COMING TO BETTER PROTECT BITCOIN USERSbitcoinmagazine.com/technical/bitcoins-privacy-just-got-better-with-silent-payments
762 sats \ 9 comments \ @Rsync25 15 Aug 2024 bitcoin
write
preview
related posts
110 sats \ 5 replies \ @BlokchainB 15 Aug 2024
“Users will need to scan through blockchain transactions to detect payments made to them. This scanning can take time, but it comes with massive privacy benefits for both users. Over time, performance of scanning can also be improved to make this less of an issue for users.”
I wonder if you could use a zero knowledge proof to speed this up. Or am I just an idiot 😆
reply
31 sats \ 4 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 15 Aug 2024
SP doesn't use ZK. Use static address.
reply
77 sats \ 3 replies \ @patrick1 15 Aug 2024
I think he's wondering if ZKPs could be used to speed up the scanning process, not for sending/receiving.
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 15 Aug 2024
First, it would be necessary add soft fork in some cases. Second, it is necessary soft forks, which are consequences? New block size wars? It is still very early for make integration into Bitcoin.
reply
93 sats \ 1 reply \ @patrick1 15 Aug 2024
I assume he's talking about the client-side ZKPs that can be used to sync/verify a node very quickly, not something at the protocol level.
reply
97 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 15 Aug 2024
One thing is ZKPs via CSV like ZeroSync, BitVM, RGB. Another is create “force” via hype or whatever a soft fork to ZKPs
reply on another page
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Leoner00955870 15 Aug 2024 freebie
Bitcoin libre de gobiernos y restricciones
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sangekrypto 15 Aug 2024
It's like a cell phone without a ringtone, as if no one heard the money being received, but how is this implemented in a system like that?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Octopus 15 Aug 2024 outlawed
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.