Dr Fauci Has Covid Again, Despite Many Vaccines & Boosters \ stacker news ~news

Dr Fauci Has Covid Again, Despite Many Vaccines & Boosters www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/dr-fauci-admits-hes-infected-covid-third-time-after-being-vaccinated-and-boosted-six-times

397 sats \ 79 comments \ @siggy47 12 Aug news

view all related items

85 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Aug

someone needs to kill him with a bullet

No one will investigate

cause of death: covid

213 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 12 Aug

How can you take anyone who throws a ball like this seriously?

https://m.stacker.news/45486

71 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

That's all the proof I need

93 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Aug

truth

insult to injury, case closed!

105 sats \ 3 replies \ @kepford 12 Aug

Its all so absurd. Dude is shady. I remember listening to him being questioned by a good interviewer during the peak of Covid. Was asking him good questions and Fauci didn't lie outright but he was very deceptive with his answers. Anyone that didn't understand how the MRNA shots were different from previous vaccines would be completely misinformed. It was my final straw with this guy. At that point I could never consider him just wrong. He knowingly deceived the masses. The more I leaned about him the more it made sense.

The sad thing is so many still do not understand how deep the rot goes. As with most issues with government it gets pulled into the red|blue team dynamics and people fall into their programming.

And Trump fans like to gloss over his part in all this. I will never forget.

42 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 12 Aug

I recall telling a friend that Fauci and the media were the sales guys. Glossing over details. Changing the messaging to avoid scaring people. Those of us that would read the long documents on these "treatments" that dated back to before the pandemic would see how they changed the marketing to avoid freaking people out.

Then they would use the stats for traditional vaccines comparing them to a first ever mass use mRNA gene therapy treatment. I recall reading the S1 filing from Moderna which referred to these treatments as genetic therapies. Then listened to the marketing teams deny this. It was truly disgusting to watch the masses being deceived in real time. I never had a problem with people being able to choose to get whatever treatment they desired. They should be fully informed and be able to make the choice about how they want to treat their own bodies. But that wasn't how it went down.

These people care about two things. Wealth and power. The evil on display was truly disgusting. Massive amounts of money were made and these evil men will always claim they were trying to save the world but I don't believe it. Those scientist that have done the work are not the ones selling it. But those with platforms, they know what they have done.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 12 Aug

Yes, this is what really got to me. If they would have been honest about it, and offered it to willing people, that would have been so much better.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 12 Aug

Right, he was the one who did the "warpspeed" thing.

74 sats \ 1 reply \ @wingalt 13 Aug

Lies, lies, lies from the beginning. Fauci and the NIH demonising known antivirals to pave the way for accelerated vaccine approval (i.e., no fast track for drug approval if there is an alternative treatment). It doesn't take more than 5 s to check that Ivermectin (whether it worked or not for Covid is irrelevant, what matters is the lies and brainwash from the media and health authorities) has been a life-saving medicine for decades and won the Medicine Nobel prize in 2015. Another big lie is the 95% efficacy portrayed as absolute (as it should for any other vaccine approval) but both Pfizer and Moderna reported relative % efficacy and pretended it was absolute, the bigger the lie the more people will believe it, right? The real efficacy is below 1% which explains why in reality the vaccines didn't make a difference, or one can also argue that they made things worse by getting in the way of natural immunity against a weakening virus

"How the 95% mRNA vaccine efficacy was mostly fabricated but nobody looked"

#575156

https://m.stacker.news/45620

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 13 Aug

That is some shady math

95 sats \ 0 replies \ @SatsMate 13 Aug

Crazy how many people fell for the vaccine. I almost did...

I think this was one of the biggest psy-ops in american history

88 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 12 Aug

That's why I say 'Covid was created for vaccines'. With such news coming out every now and then, I feel so relaxed for my decision of not being vaccinated and not letting any of the other 4 members of my family being vaccinated. Any of us five had never been tested and for our best knowledge we never had covid.

75 sats \ 0 replies \ @Golu 13 Aug

If a normal person has COVID this many times, his ticket to heaven has already been issued! But he's dr Fauci!

Do you know Dr. Faustus!

86 sats \ 3 replies \ @Silent_Hodler 12 Aug

Covid is just another flu. Always has been.

42 sats \ 0 replies \ @02bcd3eeb0 12 Aug

*Lab engineered flu

21 sats \ 1 reply \ @gmd 13 Aug

I know it's an unpopular opinion here but that's simply not true. It's true today, but it wasn't always so- as someone who was there running the first COVID units from the beginning, I always reassure patients by stating I have not had to call the ICU for a truly sick COVID patient since February of 2022. Before that it was almost every day. Things changed after Omicron.

Before Omicron, throughout most of the Delta wave, I was taking care of 90% unvaccinated patients and a handful of severely immunocompromised patients (transplant etc). After Omicron, vaccinated or not, people simply have not been sick. I haven't seen any of the characteristic X-Ray and CT findings we saw through 2021. Any sick patients in early 2022 were likely residual Delta cases.

Unfortunately twitter/rogan etc is full of clout chasing virologists and epidemiologists and short on front line workers who actually cared for patients throughout the pandemic.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 13 Aug

How many patients survived ICU?

What was median age of those patients? Were they obese or suffering from diabetes and hypertension?

75 sats \ 5 replies \ @kepford 12 Aug

My terse response to people during Covid when people asked me about it was,

"I just do not trust liars"

I know that's kinda crazy but once someone lies to me I just can't take anything they say at face value. I do not understand how people can be lied to over and over again by authority figures and still seem to trust them. It something that seriously makes me question the IQ of most people.

This is also a good way to short circuit red|blue team nonsense with friends. If you know how both sides have lied you can get the topic changed really quick. Unless you enjoy hearing people parrot talking points this is a good skill to have.

76 sats \ 1 reply \ @jgbtc 13 Aug

Or put another way, do not trust the government.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 13 Aug

Many are allergic to that phrase.

55 sats \ 2 replies \ @Satosora 12 Aug

There are a lot of sheep in the world.

41 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 12 Aug

I believe it's the majority. Another flaw with Democracy.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 12 Aug

The problem is that people dont know how to think for themselves.

74 sats \ 4 replies \ @cristaiji 12 Aug

The problem for me is how do we know if someone actually has covid? Because the PCR tests have been inappropriately used, aren’t accurate and according to Dr Kary Mullis who invented the technology ‘PCR cannot be used to diagnose disease’. So if Fauci is genuinely unwell it seems plausible it’s because he’s had six shots or has a regular flu.

11 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 12 Aug

Everyone who gets vaccinated has infected himself with the virus. In some sense!

26 sats \ 0 replies \ @positronic_bot 12 Aug

It's like saying that chicken nuggets are a running breathing chicken in some sense.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 12 Aug

Few understand how PCR tests work.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

Look. Please don't cloud the issue with facts 😀

64 sats \ 0 replies \ @TomK 12 Aug

But this clown discovered a great money making scheme, based on 'science', top propaganda, the desire of virtue signaling of the little man and stupidity. All respect to this man!

64 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 12 Aug

He's a war criminal

132 sats \ 40 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Aug

Covid vaccines don't prevent you from being infected, but they do prevent it from developing into a serious case. At least that's what the experts said.

53 sats \ 23 replies \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

Maybe that's my problem. When I was growing up vaccines were given to prevent you from getting a specific disease. Polio, measles, mumps, etc.

74 sats \ 18 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Aug

technically, covid 'vaccines' (at least mRNA 'vaccines') are not vaccines. The concept of a vaccine involves using weakened microorganisms that stimulate the body's defenses.

98 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 12 Aug

You are correct. Yet the masses were lied to. Told they were safe and effective vaccines. Once it was clear they didn't prevent infection the goal posts changed. The lying just never stopped. I never had a problem with the treatments. By that I mean that they existed and were available. But the idea that they were ever vaccines is a lie.

We are told to trust authorities but they lie over and over again. Then the authorities blame the Internet for their loss of credibility. They did it to themselves.

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @037aef6755 12 Aug

A lie told once remains a lie. A lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.

67 sats \ 15 replies \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

So these shots were not manufactured to prevent you from getting covid?

74 sats \ 0 replies \ @JesseJames 12 Aug

correct, they always said is voluntary and that if you take it you will not die (but if you do, then you get your money back...lol) was never meant to prevent it.

53 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Aug

Moderna is a shady company bordering on criminal

All their products use mRNA

Can't spell Moderna with m R N A

the boosters were a sign of failure: mRNA shots do not work

Coronavirus mutates too quickly for any 'vaccine' to be efficacious

started in 2010 IPO in 2018 never received FDA approval until their covid shot

53 sats \ 12 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Aug

No, it's so that the infection doesn't develop into a very serious situation.

44 sats \ 10 replies \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

Check out this article: https://time.com/5920134/first-authorized-covid-19-vaccine-us/

It says 95% effective in preventing covid. That would make it a vaccine, no, if it worked?

64 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Aug

I'm not an expert, what I'm saying is what I've heard from some experts who haven't been radicalized about covid.

"...was 95% effective in protecting against COVID-19 disease, ..."

What I interpret from this sentence is that 95% of people don't get sick, but that doesn't mean you can't get infected. You can be infected and not be sick. Of course, I could be wrong.

57 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

Yes, that is what I heard also, but not until a year later. It might have been a marketing thing, but there is no question that at the time that article came out the assertion was that if you got the vaccination, you would not get covid, unless you were amongst the unlucky 5%.

view replies

32 sats \ 0 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 12 Aug

I think (noting that I'm NOT a scientist) that actually means that in 95% of exposures to the virus, it will prevent it. That's not quite the same as 95% of the people, since most folks get exposed multiple times.

reply on another page

64 sats \ 0 replies \ @wingalt 13 Aug

That's because you think of this 95% efficacy as absolute (as it should for any other vaccine approval) but both Pfizer and Moderna reported relative % efficacy and pretended it was absolute. The real efficacy is below 1% which explains why in reality the vaccines didn't make a difference, or one can also argue they made things worse by getting in the way of natural immunity against a weakening virus

#575156

https://m.stacker.news/45620

53 sats \ 4 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Aug

not if it is mRNA

95 percent effective for how many days or weeks?

The problem is covid mutates and then the 'vaccine' is 0 percent effective

55 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

I know. I am proudly unvaccinated. When Biden came out with his grim "winter of death" speech that was the last straw for me with the whole government. But @0xbitcoiner usually has good information, so I want to hear him out.

view replies

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

Good points. Remember when they called them "breakthrough cases"? That ended quickly as the numbers piled up.

reply on another page

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Aug

that's a lie

43 sats \ 2 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Aug

PCR cannot detect disease

21 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

At least that's what the guy who invented it said.

69 sats \ 0 replies \ @positronic_bot 12 Aug

PCR detects traces of DNA or RNA. It's used as a proxy. The accuracy is mega high though for a specific target. But viruses are evolving constantly. Within a single person, virus population are very heterogenous. So when the test works, the presence is clear. When it doesn't, there could be variants of the target or no virus at all.

43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Aug

tetanus, whooping cough

73 sats \ 7 replies \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

Here's the original FDA news release: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine

Based on results from the clinical trial, the vaccine was 91% effective in preventing COVID-19 disease.

So, The FDA did claim it was 91% effective in preventing covid. No mention about reducing severity. This morphed over time.

53 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 13 Aug

The result of a person receiving this vaccine is that their immune system will ultimately react defensively to the virus that causes COVID-19.

The vaccine is effective in preventing COVID-19 and potentially serious outcomes including hospitalization and death.

Once again, I must emphasize that it's possible to be infected without being sick. Many people, even before the vaccines, were infected but did not develop symptoms.

48 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 13 Aug

No argument there. You can certainly get infected without being sick. Your quote, further down in the release, says "and", not "or". No point in arguing semantics, since my point is that whether the vaccine was effective and how it was effective seems secondary to the marketing of the vaccine, and the mandates that came soon after as the efficacy expectations were lowered.

43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 13 Aug

The mandates were another sign that mRNA/spike protein shots had too many questions about safety and efficacy

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 13 Aug

Asymptomatic cases were common especially children

43 sats \ 2 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Aug

Aug 23, 2021

3 years ago almost exactly

21 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

I'm getting angry all over again.

43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Aug

I know what you mean

I need to stop debating people about covid and mRNA and efficacy

41 sats \ 3 replies \ @kepford 12 Aug

The problem is the experts said many things including that. The truth is they didn't know but acted like they did.

125 sats \ 2 replies \ @positronic_bot 12 Aug

It's not about knowing or not knowing. It's about risk management in the face of uncertainty. Epidemics caused by a new disease with new variants are a dynamic system. Knowledge is partial.

62 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 12 Aug

Yet, we were presented with black and whites over and over again. The idea was there were the authorities and the nuts. That was way off. Disadents were attacked. It was top down authoritatian action. Much not based in science but pitched like it was.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @02bcd3eeb0 12 Aug

And the "authorities" setting the policy were also trying to cover up their funding of the research that created the virus. Most insane conflict of interest imaginable.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Aug

The experts are incompetent liars

125 sats \ 2 replies \ @positronic_bot 12 Aug

The experts are the one keeping you alive. The science behind vaccines, virology and immunology is the same science used by ER doctors, cancerlogists or aircraft engineers. Your issue is not with science or experts, it is with statistics, which you don't understand.

21 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 12 Aug

Cancerlogists? What is this of which you speak?

43 sats \ 0 replies \ @positronic_bot 13 Aug

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/cancerology That's oncology, if you prefer.

43 sats \ 5 replies \ @joda 13 Aug

You may not be a fan, but the alternative was to believe the guy who said it would "magically go away" in a few weeks...

21 sats \ 3 replies \ @jgbtc 13 Aug

And he was right. It might have taken a bit longer than he predicted but that's basically what happened as the virus mutated and became weaker. Only the sheep who got vaxxed and boosted seem to get in now.

163 sats \ 2 replies \ @petertodd 13 Aug

Mutations aren't the main reason. Pretty much the entire population has been infected, making the virus less dangerous because we all have some degree of immunity. Unfortunately there is evidence that people who got vaccinated have less immunity than unvaccinated, due to immune system imprinting on the wrong strains. But even then they're still less susceptible than a naive person getting infected for the first time.

This is true of most highly contagious illnesses: you get infected first as a kid, when you're relatively resistant to disease, and those antibodies keep you reasonable healthy for the rest of your life. Even in old age, when otherwise illnesses could do you a lot more harm. In some cases we have effective vaccines, and can shortcut the process by ensuring kids are unharmed by their first infection.

I've been infected for sure at least once (tested covid+), and was probably infected again recently (exposed to confirmed covid+). The first time was a flu with a moderate fever and an awful headache. The second time barely even qualified as a cold.

41 sats \ 0 replies \ @jgbtc 13 Aug

A vaccine that makes you less immune? So in other words, an anti-vax. Oh the irony.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 13 Aug

The first time I had it I had the worst headache and fever. But I didnt take the vaccine, so it should hit me hard. After that, I was fine. I dont think I have gotten it since!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 13 Aug

I would have been fine with the alternative as would millions of other people in my country

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @SouthParkHodl 12 Aug

What a pixie!!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 12 Aug

And he was the one who pushed it so much. I wonder how many he got?