she will be instructed in what to say and what to believe and will probably be instructed to appear neutral but in reality be hostile. for some reason she likes this kind of game?
In order to pander to the people that are looking at Trump, dont you think she will take a more extreme approach?
Promise more than Trump is promising?
So far she is putting very little forward in terms of policy. I think she’s just going to hope that not being Trump is enough to win and not risk alienating voters by taking positions on stuff.
She ran for president in the last election and was a senator before that. She's taken positions on everything before, so not taking any positions now is strategic.
Well, I'm sure if they are able to pull the same kind of bullshit off as they were before, they'd certainly try that out. I don't think she's going to get that chance though.
I’m almost entirely sure it’d be hostile. She’s got nothing to lose from chasing Bitcoiners and everything to win perception-wise by ‘hunting greedy capitalists that avoid paying their fair share.’
If you concur with her ranking that she was even farther left than Warren when she was a Senator, I'd expect her to carry the torch unless Ro's Pro-Crypto Army can somehow defeat Warren's Anti-Crypto Army.
I think she will be neutral as there is lots of US investment via EFTs etc. She will have seen the reaction Trump got last week at the Bitcoin conference and will definitely want to appear more open to Bitcoin prior to the election. If she is elected it might be a different story though, guess we will have to wait and see….
I picked neutral, since she might not state a policy position. That seems to be her strategy so far.
she will be instructed in what to say and what to believe and will probably be instructed to appear neutral but in reality be hostile. for some reason she likes this kind of game?
edited
I have no doubt that she's hostile to all sentient life on this planet, but this was just about what her policy is going to be.
In order to pander to the people that are looking at Trump, dont you think she will take a more extreme approach? Promise more than Trump is promising?
So far she is putting very little forward in terms of policy. I think she’s just going to hope that not being Trump is enough to win and not risk alienating voters by taking positions on stuff.
Right, I dont think that will work long term. I thought she hasnt put anything out because she needed to study up on it?
She ran for president in the last election and was a senator before that. She's taken positions on everything before, so not taking any positions now is strategic.
I guess it might work. We will have to wait and see what comes of it.
It could be whatever Blackrock decides on the matter ;)
That's the right answer.
Agree, though, equally, whatever Trump does is instructed by Putin and other war criminals, banksters and gangsters...
Hey look, it's the last person on Earth who believes the Russia Gate hoax.
According to me, it is hostile
Hostile in what way?
Because politicians are never neutral on any point. She /He wants to do all the things for his/her own benefit.
What else can we expect from Kamala after she's been too silent on economics in America after she took over the campaign from Biden?
Hostile, hostile and only hostile.
Now, Walz is also there to support the hostility.
Look at Biden. Don't expect it to differ.
You reckon she’s gonna have the same handlers?
All ready does no doubt.
My bet is that she gets more draconian handlers or at least more draconian orders since they blatantly got away with a lot in these past 4 years.
But that may be just me being a doomer. Hopefully I’m wrong.
Well, I'm sure if they are able to pull the same kind of bullshit off as they were before, they'd certainly try that out. I don't think she's going to get that chance though.
Let’s hope you’re right!
Hostile to mining Hostile to self custody Positive for kyc “safe” “crypto”
Hostile for sure. I expect the she will be a continuation of the current administration, just with a different figurehead.
She will do as she is told to do.
I’m almost entirely sure it’d be hostile. She’s got nothing to lose from chasing Bitcoiners and everything to win perception-wise by ‘hunting greedy capitalists that avoid paying their fair share.’
Same as Biden , they don’t care
The natural choice is that she will be same as Biden
The honey badger appears somewhat indifferent.
If you concur with her ranking that she was even farther left than Warren when she was a Senator, I'd expect her to carry the torch unless Ro's Pro-Crypto Army can somehow defeat Warren's Anti-Crypto Army.
Kamala will definitely be hostile towards bitcoin.
Tolerant, but if she keeps Gensler and Yellen around? Doom and gloom. But, Bitcoin won’t care either way!
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/4819345-biden-administration-cryptocurrency-industry/amp/
Whatever Trump says
I think she will be hostile towards bitcoin, but friendly towards stablecoins and alts
I think she will be a maxi. How else will she compete with trump?
Seeing how the Democratic party has been with Bitcoin before, I don't expect that much will change with Harris.
I think she will be neutral as there is lots of US investment via EFTs etc. She will have seen the reaction Trump got last week at the Bitcoin conference and will definitely want to appear more open to Bitcoin prior to the election. If she is elected it might be a different story though, guess we will have to wait and see….
She will appear neutral and wont know the stuff etc. she signs will be hostile but she wont care either :)
she might be tolerant as long as the public buys her own token of allegiance and does not criticize it in favor of bitcoin.
She’s left and woke. It’s super obvious she’ll be hostile.
I doubt she'll have any policies. She'll not be the POTUS, neither.
definitely hostile