I'm curious to hear what you think about Stackers self zapping their own post here.
Do you think it's okay to do so?
Why do you think they do it?
pull down to refresh
53 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 5 Aug
It's not like it's hurting anyone, as there's a sybil-fee deducted that goes toward the pool, and self-zapping from low-value accounts also have less "weight" compared to active accounts.
reply
88 sats \ 0 replies \ @freebookspls 5 Aug
In Digital Marketing that is a strategy called social proof, which is used to show to customers that your product is well received by the general public.
Selfzapping could create an artificial social proof that your post is relevant. "That many zaps? The community clearly thinks this is good."
Social proof works. You are more likely to zap a popular post - a.k.a. a post that was zapped a lot - even after knowing what social proof is.
reply
266 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 5 Aug
We’re considering increasing the Sybil fee to 20%.
I’d like to also make boost easier and competitive incentives-wise with self-zapping.
reply
31 sats \ 29 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 5 Aug
There's nothing you can do about multiple accounts. You can even do some IP-based control, but that's easily circumvented. As for stackers zapping their own accounts, I don't see much of a problem, more sats go to the rewards.
reply
117 sats \ 28 replies \ @tomlaies 5 Aug
I can think of 2 very obvious instances where a person is clearly arguing their own position all the time with multiple accounts.
One person is always online at the same time, magically appearing the same posts, and the most obvious always having the same lingo, wording, framework. It kind of ruins a lot of posts with quantitative posting that would have been interesting discussions otherwise
reply
31 sats \ 23 replies \ @anon 5 Aug
Looool. We all know him. Not the brightest on the left end of the iq bell curve
reply
0 sats \ 21 replies \ @Bell_curve 6 Aug
not me anonymous douche bag
reply
0 sats \ 20 replies \ @anon 6 Aug
okay Tom but everybody here already knows it. Too obvious
reply
47 sats \ 18 replies \ @Bell_curve 6 Aug
I am not @TomK
reply
21 sats \ 17 replies \ @TomK 6 Aug
Do you know what problem this clown has?
reply
47 sats \ 16 replies \ @Bell_curve 6 Aug
He thinks that you and I are the same person who created 2 accounts
view replies
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @TomK 6 Aug
look, I've really kept it together with your behavior and stayed polite you little ethereum clown. Everyone here has realized by now that you're stupid, but what problem do you have with me? Not that I'm really interested, but your appearance here is indeed very mysterious
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 5 Aug
The projection of talking with (((yourself))) and your two accounts
reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 5 Aug
I think I know who you're talking about.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 6 Aug
I only have one account
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 6 Aug
Which 2 instances?
Show us the evidence
Gutless, spineless midwit
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 6 Aug
Moron, I don't have multiple accounts
reply
11 sats \ 10 replies \ @siggy47 5 Aug
It is tried a lot here by new stackers. @k00b has done a lot to disincentivize it. There was a real dramatic incident a year or so ago where a new stacker zapped himself a million sats. It was funny.
Recently, a guy who I won't call out since he's still around did it on a very well crafted ai post. It worked. People thought he had legitimately garnered 100k sats and everyone kept zapping.
reply
88 sats \ 5 replies \ @IamSINGLE 5 Aug
What about one stacker getting zapped 1 M sats on his Bio? #29926
reply
11 sats \ 4 replies \ @siggy47 5 Aug
There you go! Another example.
reply
67 sats \ 3 replies \ @IamSINGLE 5 Aug
And this one? #59734
No, nothing, it's a shit of a post. But 1.5 million! Holy crap!
reply
11 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 5 Aug
It is not unusual
reply
67 sats \ 1 reply \ @IamSINGLE 5 Aug
Oh yes, it's not unusual, right. But is it beneficial for the platform or not? I think it is because we get 10% in the rewards pool. Amazing I right?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 5 Aug
Yep. @k00b has the incentives/disincentives worked out
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Chronicsats 5 Aug
LOL we know who that is. That starwars fella?
reply
43 sats \ 2 replies \ @Fabs 5 Aug
Oh! The one about the Nostr-guide?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 5 Aug
No comment😀
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 5 Aug
😜, I thought so the moment I saw it, way too much, way too quick.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryotosensei 5 Aug
It reeks of desperation to me, tbh
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @PoolcleanerSteve 7 Aug
@utxoclub
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @utxoclub 18 Oct
shhhhh 😉
reply
45 sats \ 43 replies \ @Satosora 5 Aug
Its not possible, right?
Unless you take the time to fund multiple accounts.
And what is the point?
If a post is good, it will get zapped.
reply
52 sats \ 42 replies \ @siggy47 5 Aug
Plenty of stackers have multiple accounts. Anon zaps can also be done. I guess if it's done judiciously it would fly under the radar.
reply
43 sats \ 41 replies \ @Satosora 5 Aug
But it is not done judiciously?
Have I interacted with people who have multiple accounts?
reply
31 sats \ 40 replies \ @siggy47 5 Aug
There is no way of knowing.
reply
130 sats \ 37 replies \ @DarthCoin 5 Aug
I know, I have a list building...
reply
43 sats \ 29 replies \ @Satosora 5 Aug
You have a list?
Can l see it?
reply
54 sats \ 28 replies \ @DarthCoin 5 Aug
yes, send me 10M sats :)
reply
20 sats \ 27 replies \ @siggy47 5 Aug
On which one of your accounts? 😀
view replies
20 sats \ 6 replies \ @siggy47 5 Aug
Is this part of your SN wallet money laundering idea?
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 5 Aug
I bet they notice when it happens and are keeping an eye on it.
reply
43 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 5 Aug
No. It is more sophisticated that part.
Using sockpuppets and zap yourself is stupid easy and can be "seen".
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Satosora 5 Aug
How can it be seen?
view replies
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 5 Aug
@koob
Are there a lot of double accounts zapping their own posts?
Am I playing a rigged game?
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @OneOneSeven 5 Aug
Try @k00b.
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jer 5 Aug
I've done this by mistake on Nostr more times than I care to admit.
reply
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @TheBTCManual 5 Aug
I guess this is people who want to bump their post up the rankings/promote it, so why not just make self zaps funds that go to the pool, because it's just another form of ads/promotion
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 5 Aug
It sounds like @k00b's boost idea will accomplish this
reply
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @030e0dca83 5 Aug
It's looks like jacking off. On the other hand zap me who never jacked off.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 5 Aug
Okay
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @tomlaies 5 Aug
Stacker News clearly labels them as "boosted" so I don't see it as an issue because it's so transparent
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satoshi__Nakamoto 5 Aug outlawed
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.
55 sats \ 0 replies \ @fernandoporazzi 5 Aug
deleted by author
reply