Oftentimes, they'll code Alaskan jobs separately and exclude them. They skew the results badly, because they are so much more dangerous than their lower 48 counterparts.
What? I have never heard of this. I heard their wages are better, but things are a lot pricer over there.
reply
That’s right, but many of the jobs are much more dangerous, because they’re done in more extreme conditions and they’re further from medical services.
reply
There was this position to run boilers at a research facility at the north pole. One of my coworkers ended up taking it and liking it. Good pay, but no life.
reply
My parents have both worked in that kind of remote environment, but I never have. I’m pretty sure they were making like $100k back in the 80’s out there.
reply
I dont know if I could ever do it. He told me it was great, but I dont know if I love snow that much. They bought him a bunch of snow gear, though. Its kind of specialized.
reply
I'm guessing that wasn't the case in this data because the Alaskan data is present in the database used in this compilation.
reply
I suspected as much, because of the jobs on the list.
reply