pull down to refresh
Decides who? How about private property rights?
Would you let your neighbors replace their homes with a gas station on one side and a fast food drive thru on the other? If not, how about your neighbors private property rights?
This is a nonsense of a comparison and You know it.
How about I forbid P2P transactions outside the USD?
It's not a nonsense comparison. It's a question about whether you believe property rights grant the right to create arbitrary negative externalities or not. Lodging has negative externalities, like other commercial use properties, even if you've never lived next to it to experience it.
Do You know the concept of internalization of external effects by garanties of property rights?
Yes, which I agree, as a libertarian, is a theoretical solution to these problems. Only, our judicial systems don’t work so we end up legislating instead, and the only contracts the government likes to enforce are its own.
There are zoning laws for that, just saying...
Yep, and lodging is also commercial use hence does not belong in residential zones.
Lodging is a commercial use. It doesn't belong in residential neighborhoods.