pull down to refresh
That's true. The meat of his point has to do with requiring stable coins to be backed by US Treasuries. That's a step beyond governments simply using the technology.
Yes, I get it, but the government is going to do what is in its best interest and preserving demand for USTs is definitely in its best interest.
Also true, but I think it's fair to describe a bill doing this as "bad news".
Absolutely, we don't need to cheer them on.
I will repeat this over and over until people will understand it:
https://i.postimg.cc/XqjKHdcp/Darth-sovereign-logo.gif
Bitcoin and the state are 2 opposite things.
Govs / states CANNOT USE/HOLD BTC. It will destroy them in the end.
Bitcoin is not for the weak, only for the brave.
How do you propose to ban countries from using Bitcoin?
simply stop using fiat
fiat = debt = how states survive
FUCK'EM'ALL if you really want freedom
EVERY time you use fiat YOU SUPPORT THE STATE and slavery.
Ok that's great. That starves the beast but that doesn't stop the state from using Bitcoin.
Who will stop the state? YOU!
So fucking stop supporting the state, stop supporting fiat system.
I understand the position and I am amenable to it but Bitcoin is a free and open network/asset. Expecting the governments and big banks not to use it for their benefit because we don't like them is a bit naïve.