20 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 28 Jul \ parent \ on: Monetary inflation is NOT taxation econ
Obviously, I disapprove of the state's monopoly on violence, so we can leave that aside.
There's no plausible argument that you have a property right in the purchasing power of your monetary savings. Purchasing power is based on the subjective valuation of sellers and you have no claim over that. All you can have a property right to is the units of money in your possession.
Since you have no right to purchasing power, you aren't being expropriated when your purchasing power is reduced via inflation.
Where your rights are being violated is in not being allowed to produce your own money. When the state enriches itself through inflation, it's really rent seeking off of that abridgement of your rights.
I disagree with that core premise that you do not own the PP, that it isn’t a core part of a modern advanced economy.
This is like one of the most important things that a stable society is said to provide, without it, commerce degrades to subsistence barter.
One cannot have an advanced economy without stability in at least one of your trade instruments.
I think it’s all about life, and time. Too many potatoes rarely ever eat into the stored value of a societies savings.
reply
Just because it's important doesn't mean you can own it. Other people are fundamental to an advanced economy, too, it doesn't imply that you can own them.
You didn't contend with my point. Purchasing power consists of thoughts in other peoples minds. What is your argument for being able to own other people's thoughts?
reply