There must be some room for the evolution of language, else those without hands through deformity or maiming risk losing human rights, the same as the unborn risk not having rights until their hands are formed and perhaps functional…further, are our rights at stake when we lose function of our hands through injury or if we do not have function of our hands through disability? I thought the documentary Tell Them You Love Me was fascinating and it fits neatly into this discussion…ultimately those who can exercise serious reasoning must protect those without hands as we are discussing them and uphold protection.
this territory is moderated
There is an evolution of language. It is built on the very basic root words of the past. These are words from 50,000 to 15,000 years ago. A man born without hands is just that. This hyperbolic statement above is ignoring the very language that we have but if we censure that language or change the meaning then we devolve into grunting angry idiots. In mythology there are plenty of traditional stories where Gods and Men took many different forms.
This is exactly the type of think that removes the finer hemispheres of the cerebral cortex and moves back through the mammalian brain to the reptilian brain. People operating on those levels will be full of fear and will need the protection (an illusion) of the sorcerer scoundrels who pray on fear and feed the non-human entities who thrive on this carnal fear.
Below is an image of the Hindu Vaishnava Krishna in various avatars: A turtle, a lion, a boar, a fish .... man evolving over time has developed extensive myths, stories, scriptures, knowledge and gnosis that spiritually lifts man beyond his "dick beaters". So a man that has a deformity or an illness is recognized as suffering just as much as a man who has everything and looses it to greed, theft or death. No man made authority will prevent suffering. We all must undergo our spiritual development and we all must speak what we need to say.
In modern terms censuring the very language strips us of 50,000 years of wisdom. This is why astronomy and astrology are very important because even before we had modern language we had painted our hands (man) and we celestially tracked the great year 26,000 year cycle of the sun through astrological houses. So in closing, Universities are places where ignorant monkeys with swords find a little wisdom and proceed to dismantle education, wisdom and learning by usurping truth with the monopoly of violence.
reply
Man may not be able to prevent suffering, but if those who are able do not take upon themselves to protect, shelter, and comfort those who are suffering from further exploitation and violence, they fail both Krishna and Jesus Christ.
In many of Ovid's stories of transformation in the Metamorphoses, those who transform do so for protection. Is it a hopeless dream to believe that man can invent tools and even "authorities" (organizations of people) which protect people from exploitation and suffering? Is it wrong to believe that man can transform nothing into something which protects those who are less fortunate? To deny that possibility is, to me, an intolerable regression of the definition of the potential of the human spirit.
reply
This is why we are here to serve and by service we find happiness. Service under the duress of regulation and or censorship is just the monopoly of violence. The power hungry will use any sweat language to sway the ignorant who are rules by external senses. But we must have a clear language to delegate, delineate, manufacture, manage, and help. Finally the free market makes us wealthy by providing the opportunities and means to help others.
If we circle back to helpless men, women or babies we can determine with clarity that more men and women and babies are harmed in our age of quarrel now!
If I see trash I pick it up. I don't wait for someone else to do it and complain about it.
I think we've gone so far of the peg here. I wish you free speech and peace!
reply