89 sats \ 3 replies \ @OneOneSeven 24 Jul \ on: Incentivizing Downzapping meta
What you describe here is exactly what I was imagining yesterday while reading your post. Randomly designating the sheriffs, their downzap is slightly more powerful.
You're right, literally a sheriff badge for downzapping is probably all you need. Couple more thoughts:
- Anyone can anonymously downzap, but maybe sheriffs' are not anonymous? You'd have more power, but more accountability to the stackers to outlaw bad content.
- I wonder if the number of active sheriffs could scale with amount of people that have "Wild West Mode" disabled? How many sheriffs should/could there be?
@carlosfandango brought a good point about the importance of sheriff anonymity, in the linked comments. We don't want anyone taking retaliatory action against downzappers.
So, while I think it would be fun to have some sheriffs strolling through town, it could get ugly very easily.
reply
reply
deleted by author
reply