Yes, it's a form of homeschooling, but most homeschooling isn't unschooling. Also, I suppose it doesn't have to be done via homeschooling.
It's sort of like how a square is both a rhombus and a rectangle, but in general rhombuses are not rectangles.
I get what you're saying, but I don't think it is quite right. Unschooling is a form of homeschooling, so Homeschooling isn't necessarily unschooling, but unschooling is homeschooling.
reply
I might have had a misconception about it then. I thought it was strictly an education methodology that hypothetically could be done by a private un-school or even a government un-school.
reply
I think we are getting off topic. I said that public schools are better than no education. Unschool is a type of education, as homeschooling is another type.
reply
In that case, I'd say that there's no such thing as no education. We're pattern seeking animals and learning is involuntary.
reply
What I mean is in a general sense of schooling. Of course people are able to learn and manage life through their experiences.
reply
If unschooling counts as education, then there's no meaningful line between education and not education.
reply
Unschooling is not uneducated. I think the original comparison should have been uneducated vs. public School educated.
reply
If unschooling is learning from unstructured experiences, what could be a better counterfactual for assessing the value added by government schools?
It's not like I'm asserting that government school isn't better than being locked in a basement.
Yes, this seems more right. In the USA, I think 99% of people have some kind of education.
Unschooling is a type of natural education. There is a meaningful line between education and no education.
reply