pull down to refresh

65 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 18 Jul \ parent \ on: This Day in Stacker News: July 18th meta
This was before we took our Sybil fee so people were self-zapping a lot.
write
preview
66 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 18 Jul
What was the benefit of self zapping back then? Did SN pay out daily rewards? and even if you did it couldn't be much.
reply
116 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 18 Jul
Rewards weren't introduce until about a year in I think. A lot of it was "look what I can do, i've outsmarted k00b."
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 18 Jul
https://i.postimg.cc/Vk21Hn8F/darth-using-lightsaber.gif
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 18 Jul
And you were like ..
https://m.stacker.news/40371
reply
53 sats \ 3 replies \ @Coinsreporter 18 Jul
The fees decision was due to self zapping?
reply
55 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 18 Jul
Yes, that's the only reason we take a zap fee. It's probably still too low though tbh.
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 18 Jul
10% as it stands is good enough, imo. You can increase it by 1 or two percent but increasing it by 100% or 200% won't be a great idea.
reply
34 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 18 Jul
Should we call it Zapperbation?
reply