15 sats \ 2 replies \ @krispy_donkey 18 Jul \ on: "Privacy-Preserving" Attribution: Mozilla Disappoints Us Yet Again privacy
Been hearing no shortage of bad press about Mozilla recently with regards to privacy, but I have not really dug into the allegations.
Does anyone know if there is any truth to this stuff, or is it yet another attack on privacy? Afaik Mozilla and the EFF are among the few fighting the good fight.
write
preview
113 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford OP 18 Jul
This story is about a new default setting in the browser. I recommend reading it and drawing your own conclusions. Firefox is a great browser but I don't like this decision personally. Mozilla could do better but I don't think they are the enemy.
There are other good options though.
LibreWolf and Mullvad Browser are both good alternatives that are based on Firefox. Brave is a good Chromium based option.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nullama 18 Jul
It's a new setting, defaults to enabled.
You can read about it here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution
reply