pull down to refresh
55 sats \ 6 replies \ @south_korea_ln 18 Jul \ on: Potential for new bitcoin adoption - YouTube banning Firearms Advertisement bitcoin
This.
I added this because so many supposed champions of liberty think that means the state forcing private entities to do what they want.
If we want to live in a truly free society we need to defend the freedoms of those doing things we disagree with as well as those we agree with.
If people don't like what YouTube is doing they should vote with their feet. Start supporting alternatives. Start using alternatives. We need to focus on actual solutions, not all this tit for tat stuff.
reply
I fully agree. The cognitive dissonance of said champions of liberty is something quite striking. I for one am against firearms, but that doesn't mean one should not be able to express their pro-gun stance.
reply
I appreciate that. I would love to see a world without violence. Often when guns is the topic or there is some violent act the weapon becomes the focus. Yet, there is another side to this. When guns are banned those that are smaller, weaker, or older made more vulnerable to the evil and strong. Firearms are an equalizer. We all have a right to defend ourselves from violence. There is no nation that has zero arms. No nation is free of violence. If good people can't defend themselves they will become victims of the more violent in society. This includes the state.
The invention of the firearm is often overlooked as a key factor in the leveling of the playing field of politics. Knights in Europe were very difficult to fight. The invention of the firearm had a dramatic effect on the balance of power. Suddenly the powerful were forced to take more consideration of the plebs.
It bothers me on a deep level when I hear people decry the right of people to defend themselves and their families. Most people in the US that I encounter who are opposed to the right of self defense seem to support the government and police using arms to commit violence. They aren't opposed to war. Laws do not prevent criminals from obtaining arms. They prevent good people from being able to defend themselves.
All that said, we have deep cultural problems that have led to the violence on our streets. Removing the right of people to defend themselves will not solve this problem.
reply
Thank you for laying out your thoughts. I'd be happy to discuss all of this one day in person. As an outsider to the US, living in a gun-free country, there are many nuances that are hard to grasp.
reply
For sure. Cultural difference as well. You say you live in a gun-free country... does that include the police and military? Are there no criminals? Call be skeptical. Or by that do you mean that private gun ownership is not allowed?
reply
reply