54 sats \ 3 replies \ @Nuttall 17 Jul
I just saw a little bit of it.
What if he was convinced that he could PROTECT Donald Trump by being a sniper and he was set up. After the real shooter did his thing the boy was shot by USS sniper.
reply
44 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 17 Jul
Granted I don't trust what we are being told about this kid, people are pointing out he was a registered republican like that matters. Others are pointing out he donated to act blue. If I am to take this at face value neither on their own give you motive.
Many people change their politics like changing shirts and also never update their voter registration. I know I didn't until many years later. A few years ago I de-registered.
Donating to a cause is obviously a stronger signal than voter registration. Also, do not forget. There are many republicans that hate Trump as much as the democrats do.
Regardless, a kid that would do this is not well.
reply
23 sats \ 0 replies \ @Nuttall 17 Jul
When we hear about false flags and also patsy use and MKULTRA it's not hard to come to the conclusion that an unknown, young man would be used. Maybe more interesting is that if he thought he was on the protection team he would not act too strange and his thin background would not arouse suspicion. Direct him to the location and have a trained shooter nearby to do the deed and maybe do the deed with non-lethal precision. Then have normal protection execute the perceived shooter..
Regardless the deep state will gain power because the result of any state is a deep state. Then there will be a broke state, a replacement state and the financial state will continue.
reply
23 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 17 Jul
That's pretty dark. Interesting thought, though.
reply
32 sats \ 6 replies \ @IamSINGLE 17 Jul
Ohh! Comeon, I'm just fed up with all that is being speculated about the possible assassination of Trump! It would have been interesting if he was injured by the bullet but actually he was by a shoe strap while falling down!
reply
24 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 17 Jul
Why the irritation? It's a major event that hasn't been fully explained. Of course people are going to keep analyzing the details until they understand it.
reply
32 sats \ 2 replies \ @IamSINGLE 17 Jul
Not irritating to me. Not at all! It's just my way of analysis. Let me say it again. Trump wasn't rubbed by a bullet, in fact he rubbed a shoe buckle or strap while he fell down after he listened that the shots were fired.
reply
24 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 17 Jul
He's not that good of an actor. Have you seen Home Alone 2? Also, there are a bunch of photos of him on the ground. Nothing I've seen supports what you're asserting.
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 17 Jul
I may be wrong but I don't think that the bullet rubbed his ear.
reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 17 Jul
He was injured, bullet grazed his ear
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 17 Jul
Not the bullet, only something that was there on the stage.
reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 17 Jul
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-07-17/trump-shooting-3d-model-of-showground-rally-site/104104418
Aerial views
reply
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 17 Jul
Kind of frustrating that they don't actually show you the perspectives from the rooftops, but rather hover above them. Still, it's a neat construction.
reply
44 sats \ 4 replies \ @freetx 17 Jul
https://m.stacker.news/40186
In this clip with Bongino (former Secret Service) + Tucker + Don Jr....they say that the roof where the sniper shot from was supposed to have an agent positioned on it, but the agent never showed up that day.
The story keeps getting weirder....
reply
34 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 17 Jul
I hadn't heard that yet. The story seems to keep changing. They've also said that the agents were inside the building because the roof was dangerously sloped.
I have heard former Secret Service say that Trump should not have been allowed out of the car until someone confirmed that everything like that roof was secured.
reply
55 sats \ 2 replies \ @freetx 17 Jul
Yes, Bongino makes the point that this is reason for nonsensical excuses of "roof too sloped"....is that they are covering up for the missing agent.....and also dovetails with the confusing reports that "agents were inside the building". Basically they are doing the old routine of throwing out so much conflicting and overlapping info to muddy the water.
Another bit of weirdness is that they originally reported that "suspicious van with arizona plates that had explosives" was linked to shooter.
Now they say shooter was in Hyundai Sonata....so what happened to the van? Was that not linked to shooter? who owns the van? (note: typically car rental plates are from AZ because of the low fees and ease of out-of-state registration).
https://m.stacker.news/40188
reply
34 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 17 Jul
Right. Why was it believed to be the suspect's if it wasn't? And, more importantly, if it wasn't the suspect's van, then whose van was full of explosives and why?
reply
34 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 17 Jul
Maybe 1 person drove 2 cars.....like 2 planes knocked down 3 buildings?
reply
34 sats \ 3 replies \ @zuspotirko 17 Jul
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GSp1GzmasAAWGVV?format=jpg&name=medium
reply
13 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 17 Jul
Seems like a strawman
reply
34 sats \ 1 reply \ @zuspotirko 17 Jul
It's a hyperbole. Sometimes the simple, straightforward solution is the true one
reply
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 17 Jul
Ok. I'm not sure who it's directed at. I've been following the story pretty extensively and I haven't seen anyone making those arguments. That's why it seemed like a strawman.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 17 Jul
Secret Service director has been subpoenaed by Congress
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Satosora 17 Jul
I think we need to wait for information to trickle our way before we come up with some mad conspiracy theories.
reply
33 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 17 Jul
I agree. It's reasonable to think through the possible scenarios that fit the evidence we have, but it seems too early to draw many conclusions.
reply
34 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 17 Jul
Yes, and everyone needs to realize that the information they give us might also be missing some key points.
We have to question everything and look at everything under a microscope.
Trust but verify!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 17 Jul
https://truthsocial.com/@CitizenFreePress/112803569202140654
4 minute clip
Another classmate
reply