pull down to refresh

100 sats \ 2 replies \ @Hakuna 11 Jul \ parent \ on: Guide: Connect your LN node via wireguard VPN Tunnel using a VPS clearnet IP bitcoin
ssh -N -R 8080:localhost:8080 root@vps
Valid points, however everyone needs to make their own choice of convenience vs speed & security. As I'm putting my own sats on the line, I err on latter.
https://m.stacker.news/39287
Summary For maximum security and speed: As said wg would be my recommended choice, and we have it in productions with many VPNs and clients across the globe. And following that guide isn't that much PITA, but actually a great linux learning experience. I'd say this is a good asset if you're into running a node in any case.
For simplicity and quick setup: SSH tunneling can be a decent option, especially for temporary or less sensitive use cases.
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @justin_shocknet 11 Jul
ehh.. those are very unsubstantial claims... Are you suggesting SSH is cryptographically broken and ignoring that it has far more production use in the wild than anything else?
Speed I'd give you sure, but the kind of things one would use it for is not going to be noticeable
It's probably a better Linux 101 to understand the vast capabilities inherent to SSH and get the user terminal maxxing
reply
101 sats \ 0 replies \ @Hakuna 11 Jul
I'm not suggesting the cryptography is broken, but having an ongoing SSH root tunnel exposes unnecessary attack vectors. Terrapin was just the recent one, and I'm in favor to not have my ssh in the open at all.
Yes you can FW restrict the access to specific ip ranges, but then you're back into the configuration and security overhead you intended to avoid in the first place.
Read my summary, I think it's a valid option, but I wouldn't want this for my production routing node running for 4 years 24/7
reply