The authors speculate that the melodic changes that occurred in 1975 could represent the rise of genres such as new wave, disco and stadium rock. Those occurring in 1996 and 2000 could represent the rise of hip-hop or the adoption of digital audio workstations, which enabled the repeated playing of audio loops, they add.
The authors note that although the complexity of popular melodies appears to have decreased in recent decades, this does not suggest that the complexity of other musical components—such as the quality or combinations of sounds—has also decreased.
They speculate that decreases in melodic complexity could result from increases in the complexity of other musical elements, such as an increase in the average number of notes played per second, to prevent music from sounding overwhelming to listeners. Additionally, they propose that expansions in the availability of digital instruments may enable musical complexity to be expressed through sound quality, rather than melody.
I don't know much about music, so I thought of posting it here rather than in the ~science territory. More knowledgable people might be able to comment on these observations.
Does it match your experiences?
this territory is moderated
Simpler sounds negative. More catchy would be a more positive framing of the same thing.
Simultaneously there are more genres that are further apart than ever. And more creative lyrics than ever. More kinds of instruments than ever in the mainstream
reply
I'm not a musician but I think we can talk from the barefoot listener point of view. Regarding modern music, when I was younger I did saw, so blatantly that I noticed, an increment in shitty music to unusual levels in standard media. It only lasted for some years, until healthy music started to appear back again. But during those years the radio became unreliable, music was so unbearably shitty (local and international) that it depressed me at some point and had to resort to old CDs. Then I became acquainted to YouTube and it changed all forever. YouTube also gave me a gaze of what old music looked like and I can confirm that melodic complexity has not decreased but all the contrary. The music of my parents era consisted of the exact same simple setup repeated relentlessly for a same artist and between artists. The music of my grand-parents era was even more simple, there wasn't even a changing point anywhere along the play, just the same three notes cycling endlessly. I could see that pre WWI era in the USA was the same for all known popular plays. Of course all along there have been outstanding, atemporal exceptions, but the average has moved along the lines I'm describing. The simple reason music that's low in complexity is broadcasted the most is that it's cheap to produce and the vast majority of people is happy with it, so it's a no-brainer for the producers, specially since the economics of the music industry of mass distribution have become harsher with time, the revival of good music probably due to alleviation from the advent of cheaper and more sophisticated edition tools. And all of that is also the reason most complex music has found a safe place in social media platforms that give them niche reach all along the planet making them economically viable.
reply