How is creativity tested?
To answer your question, maybe. Serious creative thinking requires a huge space to fail and try and keep failing and keep trying.
To learn a craft in the formal education system is possible. I went to a public high school and miraculously had a theatre teacher who was a working actress and knew how to teach acting the right way.
My first suggestion for a formal exercise to encourage creative thinking is to present a simple problem, such as “How would you cut a cake without a knife?” This inspires divergent thinking (piano wire, a mirror, a skateboard, karate chop, etc.). I wouldn’t ask students to practice convergent thinking (settle on a final answer) until they’ve finished at least a page.
That’s incredible. There’s a saying that goes, “Those who can’t, teach”, but I think that is flawed because you got to master your craft AND know how to distill it to a level that is relatable to teenagers without much world experience and who probably find schooling boring. Kudos to your theatre teacher.
I love your exercise. It’s like giving students a blank slate and challenging them to make of it what they will. I think primary school kids will ironically do better at this task than their older secondary counterparts, maybe because they aren’t rendered hardened by the stresses of the education system. I can just imagine my teenagers shrugging their shoulders, saying IDK n then switching off for the entire lesson haha.
At what age do children lose their innate curiosity to the system? Hmmm
reply
Oh boy. Your response and the word teenagers inspired me to think of another creative writing exercise. This one might be a little challenging? But it can be altered quite a bit.
So we have pangrams - sentences which contain every letter of the alphabet. "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" is probably the most well known. Here we have a pangram, which is just a fun thing to know exists when studying language, and we either rewrite or respond to it in a way that acknowledges the sentence, but emphasizes the elements of language that lead to sonic prosody: onomatopoeia, alliteration and rhythmic effects. I also like to use figurative language, which is rather related but different, and I'll get into in a second.
I personally lean a lot on alliteration and rhythmic effect in these examples, but you can obviously play around a lot to adjust or alter this sort of exercise. The point is to give a known form and ask the student to respond with what they know. That same teacher I mentioned was also my freshman English teacher and she gave us an assignment to rewrite the famous balcony scene in Romeo and Juliet using new language from a different mode of speech or character archetypes. She gave the example "surfer and valley girl." I remember I did the exercise using chatspeak! Which she didn't get at first and gave me a C for the exercise, and then crossed it out and gave me an A (lol).
Anyway, here are a few examples of this exercise, "Responding to pangrams with prosody":
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. I acquiesce to your guess, riddler of men made of gem.
The jay, pig, fox, zebra and my wolves quack! Bird and beast, fur on four legs: they call like ducks.
Waxy and quivering, jocks fumble the pizza. Those jocks got stuck like cheese in the wind.
To respond to your question, "At what age do children lose their innate curiosity to the system?" I personally recall getting so stressed out about how my grades would affect my future starting in middle school, when it was revealed our grades in middle school would affect our high school placement, and that the high school placement and those subsequent grades were the major determining factors in what colleges we could go to.
However, in middle school too I had a passionate English teacher who introduced us to figurative language and gave us a lot of figurative language exercises and personally encouraged me to get interested in rhyme (I remember getting myself a rhyming dictionary for Christmas lol). Figurative language and even rhyming exercises may also be appropriate conduits to teaching creative thinking in a language setting.
reply
I had another thought about this topic,
If we do the exercise I suggest above, when we ask students to settle on a “final answer,” what are the guidelines for it? I think any guidelines we could impose other than “What’s your favorite?” can stifle creativity because the student starts to look for the “best” solution based on the educator’s guidelines, rather than exercising personal will to choose for themselves.
Why it’s important to exercise personal will as opposed to follow external guidelines might be a high level meditation on art. I’ve only recently had this thought so I’m not yet so terribly familiar with that I can make an argument. But I think it’s pretty seriously related.
reply