pull down to refresh

The original goal of the AI field was to create machines with general intelligence comparable to that of humans. Early AI pioneers were optimistic: In 1965, Herbert Simon predicted in his book The Shape of Automation for Men and Management that “machines will be capable, within twenty years, of doing any work that a man can do,” and, in a 1970 issue of Life magazine, Marvin Minsky is quoted as declaring that, “In from three to eight years we will have a machine with the general intelligence of an average human being. I mean a machine that will be able to read Shakespeare, grease a car, play office politics, tell a joke, have a fight.”
This pursuit remained a rather obscure corner of the AI landscape until quite recently, when leading AI companies pinpointed the achievement of AGI as their primary goal, and noted AI “doomers” declared the existential threat from AGI as their number one fear. Many AI practitioners have speculated on the timeline to AGI, one predicting, for example, “a 50% chance that we have AGI by 2028.” Others question the very premise of AGI, calling it vague and ill-defined; one prominent researcher tweeted that “The whole concept is unscientific, and people should be embarrassed to even use the term.”
This is where I am today on AGI
very premise of AGI, calling it vague and ill-defined; one prominent researcher tweeted that “The whole concept is unscientific, and people should be embarrassed to even use the term
These terms are thrown around so lightly and with little care. Its absurd and I feel like someone is trying to scam me constantly.
I believe humans are spiritual beings created by a loving and unfathomable creator. The idea that a machine could think like a human comes from a very different perspective. It reeks of arrogance. Arrogance is something I have observed in many who make fools of themselves.
I'm not opposed to advancement of technology. Many things we take for granted today would appear to be magical to our ancestors. I suspect that will continue.
reply
The idea that a machine could think like a human comes from a very different perspective. It reeks of arrogance.
Tbh, the idea that a machine could not think like a human can also be seen as arrogant.
We humans tend to think we are special but I am pretty sure we are just an accident.
reply
Haha I dont think a lot of people realize how quick they can learn if they have unlimited knowledge. Skynet anyone?
reply
38 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 4 Jul
Nah. Not an accident
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 4 Jul
Oh, go on, I'm curious.
reply
We humans tend to think we are special but I am pretty sure we are just an accident.
Agree, an evolutionary accident
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Fabs 4 Jul
+1, A series of lucky mutations in some of our [ancestor's] genes are what brought us to where we are today, not some mysterious creator(s).
reply
don't forget selective breeding.
reply
What if the humans are just a tool of the unfathomable creater to create artificial intelligence that is 100 000 000 times than the sum of the intelligences that live and ever have lived on earth 🤔🤔
reply
I see you found the good stuff and have been fun smoking it.
reply
I dont know if society is actually ready for a functioning AI. We cant even get half of our shit in order.
reply
20 sats \ 3 replies \ @Car OP 4 Jul
We def not ready but forced change is still change. One of the reasons I continue to read more about this transformation is that it eerily reminds me of the transition in the music industry when musicians quickly shifted from analog to digital recording, almost overnight.
This shift, combined with the rise of Napster, caused a major upheaval. I suspect we'll experience a similar process with AI. This time, technologists will understand that pain and disruption. Being extremely niche with a community has never been more important.
The initial phase will be marked by an overwhelming wave of commoditization. Maybe just maybe Bitcoin will be that P2P layer extract that value.
reply
I think it is dependent on a few factors. People are worried AI will take over everything, but I believe no matter what there will always need to be oversight. Maybe it takes on some tech positions, but their code isnt going to be implemented without it being checked by human eyes, first.
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @Car OP 4 Jul
It was the same with the music industry; all that resulted were lawsuits and the DMCA. I imagine we'll see something similar. As for...
checked by human eyes, first.
Different plugins fixed this, as well as having a producer or a curator of great taste to clean up the sound after it was tracked or layed down.
reply
Dont get me wrong, there is a lot AI could do. But it will forever need to be checked by a human. Im sure people will get butt hurt and do things in order to stay relevant.
reply