503 sats \ 10 replies \ @DarthCoin 3 Jul \ on: Why Did Russia Invade Ukraine? earth
It's all a globalist game. all wars are banksters wars.
write
preview
117 sats \ 3 replies \ @kepford OP 3 Jul
Honestly, this is the TLDR on most global conflict. It doesn't explain HOW wars are started and promoted but be sure that those that profit most have the most to lose from peace. Following the money is always a good lens to use.
reply
72 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 3 Jul
That's why people should not take sides, should not participate in these games, should not fund them, should not support them. Live your life in peace and FUCK'EM'ALL.
reply
38 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford OP 3 Jul
Regardless of where you are from most of us have no conflict with people we have never seen. Almost all of the time there are criminals that want to get us to hate people we have never seen. These people are being manipulated to do the same. In most cases plebs on both sides are being lied to and deceived. The plebs on the other side are being demonized to justify killing them.
reply
38 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford OP 3 Jul
I'm on the side of the plebs. War is the health of the state so of course it will always be looking for conflict.
reply
40 sats \ 5 replies \ @anon 3 Jul
Globalists want less wars because they are pro open borders. That's LITERALLY what the word means, like it's already in the word itself.
You can't just slap <People I don't like> on every <thing I don't like> like whatever. That's such an 80-IQ way of thinking
reply
117 sats \ 3 replies \ @wingalt 3 Jul
Globalists like the WEF and the Club of Rome alike are Malthusians and on top of their agenda is depopulation so they will always push for more wars. Less people on the planet and it makes a few people very rich, that is what the war racket is all about and it is a well tested recipe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 3 Jul
lol you're completely delulu. Try sniffing your own farts less
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 3 Jul
How to allocate resources? Depopulation
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @wingalt 3 Jul
There has been much more resources discovered than any of these groups had predicted in the 1950-60s, more people means more brains to solve problems no need for a planned population number, those policies tend to backfire (e.g., one-child policy in China)
reply
117 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 3 Jul
How do you suppose globalists plan to open those borders? With tanks and shit.
One-world government doesn't mean a peaceful utopia, it means crushing all resistance and the extermination of sovereignty both on the individual and cultural (national) level... You ignorant muppet
reply