pull down to refresh
32 sats \ 11 replies \ @Coinsreporter OP 25 Jun \ parent \ on: Water shortage to affect India's sovereign credit strength: Moody's econ
I don't think that world really needs markets in water as of now. You can say I'm one of the resistants.
Water actually needs a proper distribution or people need to relocate near the abundance of water, as they used to do in ancient times.
How can water resources of any place sustain when more than 120 million people living with a density of nearly 30000 people every square mile.
India, as I can see still has a lot of fresh water resources. Thanks to the great Himalyas. ...
Water actually needs a proper distribution
That's why it needs a free market. There's no better distribution system.
reply
I don't mean it from the PoV of selling it. It should be distributed as free.
reply
Price controls cause shortages. I'm all for charity, but charity is not sufficient for the entire distribution.
reply
For water, it's a 'nah!'
Water is a human right. It needs to be managed as a common good. Considering water as a commodity or a business opportunity will leave behind those that cannot access or afford the market prices.
reply
"Human right" isn't a magic spell that causes distribution. Centrally planned distribution will be more costly and lower quality. Also, absent a profit motive, there won't be any innovation in this space.
The sectors that work the best have market mechanisms. Why wouldn't you want that for the most important things?
For example, food is commodified and it gets where it's needed and the productivity of agriculture goes up every year.
If you said food needs to be free and centrally planned, because it's a human right, there would be mass starvation.
reply
Water is not only there for our bellies. It's also used for many other things. I think, water, if commodified, will be more expensive than food for everyone. There are various types of foods for hunger, some are costly and some are cheap. All can survive, no matter poor or rich. But water will not have that advantage and will be available in the same form for everyone. Say, it had a severe shortage, and the prices would touch skies, could you come up with alternative or could you refrain drinking it?
reply
What happens if there's a shortage, now? How does involving the government fix that?
If there's a market, then when there's a regional shortage, supply will be diverted from other uses in other places, to meet the more urgent demand.
There's no reason to think a water market wouldn't be highly competitive. It can be produced in many places, using several different methods. In competitive markets, prices tend towards the marginal cost of production, which is very low for water.
Government monopolies have no direct mechanism to drive down their costs, because they get their revenue coercively.
reply
You're presenting an ideal picture of market. I'm just worried about those situations when and where corporates manipulate prices for demand and supply reasons. Water is so much essential for life that it may someday well be sold drop by drop.
I'm not saying that only government should manage water supply. There can be other players as well. But it should be ensured that at least safe drinking water is available for everyone.