pull down to refresh
101 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 25 Jun freebie
-- https://docs.uma.me/uma-standard/uma-addresses (emphasis mine)
Mhh, so anyone with UMA could use Lightning directly if the recipient supports it.
However, this is a BIG if since I guess for tradfi (for which this seems to be built with all this compliance architecture), compliance providers are pretty important. So I am worried that the plan of UMA is to embrace, extend and extinguish lightning addresses when most people use UMA and the sender stops supporting LNURL.
If this is built for tradfi and compliance in mind, it doesn't make sense for them to allow sending to someone which isn't using UMA.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 25 Jun
https://m.stacker.news/37121
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 25 Jun freebie
So this means I have accepted the truth?
reply
26 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 25 Jun
STAY AWAY FROM THESE FUCKERS!
You have been warned.
reply
105 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 25 Jun
100 million customers is no joke.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 25 Jun
it's a regulatory trap
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nikotsla 26 Jun
Fuck UMA, a profane use of LNURL, just a walled garden own circus, there is NO interaction with other nodes unless you comply... there is NO difference with VISA/MASTERCARD channels.
reply