This Day in Stacker News: June 23rd
550 sats \ 13 comments \ @Undisciplined 23 Jun meta
zaps forwarded to @nout (20%) @k00b (20%)
I may have messed up something in the formatting that @0xbitcoiner developed. Let's say one kilosat prize for anyone other than him, who finds it: #582758.
Read the previous edition here.

June 23rd, 2023 📅

📝 TOP POST
Coinkite and their toxic attitude towards users who highlight issues
Excerpt:
While ColdCard's hardware may be good, their owner and their practices are sketchy and that's a huge red flag.
4481 sats \ 43 comments \ @satoshisat \ ~bitcoin

💬 TOP COMMENT
#197711
My wife and kids. Better investment than bitcoin IMO.
From What’s your best investment (besides BTC)?
493 sats \ 0 replies \ @gnilma

🏆 TOP STACKER
@k00b
11.7k stacked \ 27k spent \ 2 posts \ 41 comments \ 0 referrals

June 23rd, 2022 📅

📝 TOP POST
I'm Sergej Kotliar, CEO of Bitrefill. AMA.
Excerpt:
We’ve been a pioneer in Lightning, were the first merchant to accept lightning and are still the number one place where people go to spend their Lightning sats.
20.9k sats \ 68 comments \ @ziggamon \ ~bitcoin

💬 TOP COMMENT
#37985
I think there will always be people who don't want to be completely self-sovereign. But at least they will have the option of handing over responsibility to a party they know personally. LndHub, LNBank, Galoy and Fedimint are all examples of a project that is custodial but at least they can be deployed and managed by friends/people you trust.
From I am Pavol Rusnak, Co-Founder of SatoshiLabs. AMA
243 sats \ 1 reply \ @stick

🏆 TOP STACKER
@nout
1703 stacked \ 42.9k spent \ 1 post \ 16 comments \ 0 referrals

June 23rd, 2021 📅

📝 TOP POST
A from-scratch tour of Bitcoin in Python
link to https://karpathy.github.io/2021/06/21/blockchain/
4 sats \ 3 comments \ @sha256 \ ~bitcoin

💬 TOP COMMENT
#87
Made by https://twitter.com/benthecarman and you can follow the twitter bot https://twitter.com/OP_RETURN_Bot
From Store a message forever on the Bitcoin blockchain
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b

🏆 TOP STACKER
EMPTY
write
preview
related posts
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 23 Jun
@gnilma with the top comment last year. Awesome and a timeless comment indeed.
reply
81 sats \ 0 replies \ @gnilma 23 Jun
Thanks. I think many people with wife and kids probably feel the same way.
reply
21 sats \ 6 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 23 Jun
I think I've figured it out. Other posts are also different from the original, right?
reply
21 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 23 Jun
I've made a small number of tweaks. One was to slightly increase the header sizes.
reply
21 sats \ 4 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 23 Jun
I noticed a few changes, and I actually think it looks better this way. Feel free to change whatever you like. But that's not what you're asking in the post, is it?
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 23 Jun
No, I'm trying to see if someone will tell me what your comment meant, since you chose to be cagey about it and I couldn't figure it out.
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 23 Jun
this comment ? "one of my TOPs doesn't appear? 😂"
I understand what the comment means, but you have to cut me some slack because I'm not a native English speaker and it could mean something else that I didn't get.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 23 Jun
I assumed you were talking about one of the headers.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 23 Jun
oh, no !
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @gnilma 23 Jun
I remember that comment from a year ago. Still top comment, to me subjectively, a year later.
It seems you are doing this every day with a script that you've written, correct? I've been silently zapping and reading these posts since you've started posting them. It's cool to go down memory lane and have a comment or post remind me of something in the past, even though my time on SN is just over a year old. Thank you for that.
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 23 Jun
I'm much too dumb for that. I just have template saved that I update manually. For now, that's better anyway, since it means I actually read everything.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @gnilma 23 Jun
I wouldn't call it dumb. It's just different skillsets and knowhow. Doing it manually does provide the benefit of reading through what you're posting and is also very good proof of work.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 23 Jun
I'm not too dumb to learn it (I don't think), but I am currently too dumb to do it.
reply