pull down to refresh

There is no prohibition against using AI. I would say that stackers here value original thought, so there is a bias against it. I personally don't like it, and would not use it. I don't want to be completely close minded about it, though. There are a few stackers who obviously use AI in discussion as a sort of factual wikipedia layout of the issues. It's use is obvious, and the stacker doesn't try to pass it off as original. Some people may find that valuable.
this
reply
I assumed that there was no prohibition, it was the most logical thing for me, I know that stackers value human and original content, I have no doubt, but if you have used AI in your publication, it might be good to detail it at some point, at least that you partially used AI in your content, I think this is done on Medium for example.
reply
I wasn't aware that medium does that. It's a good idea
reply