reply on: This Day in Stacker News: June the 18th \ stacker news ~meta

60 sats \ 10 replies \ @grayruby 18 Jun \ on: This Day in Stacker News: June the 18th meta

Has anyone responded to you yet when you reply to the post/comment advising it is the top one from x year(s) ago?

79 sats \ 9 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 18 Jun

Yes, @felipe chatted with me and @cryotosensei a bit.

It does kind of bum me out seeing all these early stackers who aren't active anymore.

Yes, I wonder if early stackers left because there wasn't much going on at the time and they lost interest. It would be great if some early stackers who aren't active anymore came back now to see their reaction to how the site and community has grown and changed.

50 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 18 Jun

Maybe so. I do remember there being quite a bit of pushback against territories. You may have driven some of them away when you emerged victorious in that battle.

53 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby 18 Jun

Yes, I recall there were some who did not approve of the SN fork.

92 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 18 Jun

Lots of people end up losing their login credentials and creating new accounts too.

61 sats \ 3 replies \ @Coinsreporter 18 Jun

SN had a fork!!

Soft or hard?

42 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 18 Jun

Hard fork. Big subbers won.

30 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 18 Jun

Was it a hard fork? I think a lot of the opponents just muted all the new content and carried on like nothing ever happened.

I guess it's still a hard fork, but they're pretending like it wasn't.

52 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 18 Jun

Yes, they can simulate backwards compatibility by muting everything that was post the fork but they can't really run the pre-fork SN.

reply on another page

71 sats \ 0 replies \ @felipe 18 Jun

@grayruby @Undisciplined

👀