Oof. Hopefully there are a decent number of VPN users and folks in Russia who can help others get access to these.
Then question is - what browser to recommend them in this case.
reply
I don't think there's an easy answer. Any central repository managed by the company (Apple, Firefox, Google, etc) is subject to the same thing. At its core, FF is a solid privacy browser to start with, but add-ons are needed for any of them (even Brave). People pretty much have to help others individually to get access to the tools.
reply
Ladybird?
reply
Sorry, I know only ladybug 🤷‍♂️
reply
reply
Yes, found it already, it was a joke:) anyway it's quite early but interesting to see how it develops in the future.
reply
Ah, sorry. I have a harder time distinguishing sarcasm in our "post truth" world.
reply
I suppose if you don't have kids the joke is not obvious:)
reply
Nope. If it concerns children and programming, I pretty much hate modern civilization in that regard these days, and wasn't very fond of it when I was more in touch with it.
I guess Tor Browser is their only option. I like Librewolf, which is a fork of Firefox focused on privacy, but it uses the same Mozilla add-ons. Not sure if there's a way to circumvent this kind of censorship.
reply
Did they block it on their hosted add on store or did they block the actual extension in Firefox? The latter is far more concerning if so, but I doubt it!
reply
Russians are not stupid. Please explain how the country with brilliant "hackers" also has censured the people.
It's bullshit.
Russians can see anything. They may choose not to.
reply
It'sa pay wall that you pay with your email.
reply
why did they comply with this demand ? what's in it for them ?
reply
103 sats \ 1 reply \ @zx 13 Jun
Good question.
While Mozilla might seem virtuous, they clearly have motives.
"The Mozilla Foundation, which in tandem with its for-profit arm Mozilla Corporation releases Firefox, also operates its own VPN service, Mozilla VPN. However, it is only available in 33 countries, a list that doesn’t include Russia."
I'm trying to remember what other news came out recently that seemed to highlight the political stance of Mozilla Corporation, I think it was related to not allowing payments in cryptocurrencies, generally.
Seems that for an open source project, they grew pretty large and like many browsers that come preinstalled with search engines, tailored for different locations, they surely have backers and financial interests these days.
reply
they surely have backers and financial interests these days
I don't have the answer either, but I think you're right about this. I hope we get to find out soon.
reply