With all this end of democracy talk, I thought this was an interesting take by Balaji.
Because California Democrats do not hold competitive multiparty elections. No matter how the people vote, a Democrat always wins. The real election is thus actually a selection, where candidates are chosen before the primary in a smoke-filled room by the Party. And around the time one-party control was consolidated in the early 2010s, governance started to dramatically worsen, and California's growth rate suddenly leveled off:
this territory is moderated
Questioning the democratic party's commitment to democracy is a danger to democracy. The New York Times, LA Times and Washington Post all told me so, so it must be true.
reply
Its a big state. It is too big. It is a case story for what is wrong with democracy. Lived here most of my life. Born and raised. SoCal and the Bay Area pretty much rule the state but there are many wonderful communities throughout the state that are more like the rest of the country than those two regions. Politically it has been a lost cause since the 90s.
The state had a chance to fix many issues by splitting it up a few years ago. Most republicans mocked the idea. I swear, there is nothing more pointless than a republican politician in California. Of course the California clown court removed the proposition starting the process of breaking up the state from the ballot. Its one of the most under-reported events in the state's history if you ask me. It was a serious shut up slave moment.
Had that process began I think people living in the less extremely progressive areas of the state could have had a stronger voice in the direction of gov polices. The programming is strong. Even when it is in the best interest of conservatives they seem to just shoot themselves in the foot.
Since Covid a massive number of the productive class and more conservative folks have flocked to other states. I have lived in a few states and frequently visit other states. California isn't as different from other states as you hear in the media. Many states are maybe 5 years behind California. I rarely see anyone acknowledge this. I think of California as a state with a government more aligned with a European country with a large welfare system. Its not China. Its for sure not North Korea.
City vs. Rural is really the story and it is a nation-wide difference. Most of the more free states tend to have fewer and smaller cities. Fewer and smaller government unions. People love to have something that they can compare themselves to that covers up their own problems. California is screwed up. What is more of a story is how many states are following the lead of California instead of learning lessons. There are a few that seem to be taking a different path like Tennessee, Florida, Idaho, and Texas. California is the canary in the coal mine if you will.
reply
New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey and their neighbors are replicating California.
Maybe New York started the insanity in the 1970s when New York City was officially bankrupt
reply
Proposition 187 passed in 1994.
Proposition 8 passed in 2008.
A federal judge overruled the voters both times.
reply
All "Democracy" means in American politics is "rule by Democrats", so California is for sure a Democracy.
reply
*Democratacy
reply
It’s such a shame. California was always my dream US travel destination.
I followed what was happening during covid with the restrictions, exodus of people to other states, the crazy extreme left politics that appear to have caused the degradation of cities like San Francisco, LA etc.
I reckon we got off lightly in the UK. But also where I live many people could see through the covid theatre to some degree and didn’t go along with it.
reply
I lived in a LA for a few years. California really is a beautiful place. It has everything. What has happened there politically is very sad.
reply
So, California is rather becoming the China of US. People need to be smarter whole residing in a democracy. IMO, they must change the government everytime if they really want better functioning of democratic state.
We have a few states in India where people have a tendency to vote for opposite party every time. And what I can practically witness that these states have seen better development.
reply
Do we have problems with the states run by Republicans in this way?
reply
I think the irony is that they claim to care about democracy. It doesn't really hold for Republicans, who make no such claims.
reply
What is the Republican claim? A republic?
reply
I guess so. I just know that I don't hear Republicans talking about "Our Democracy" all the time.
reply
Are Republicans winning without making claims, or are you just unaware?
reply
Republicans tend to campaign like Ron Paul and then govern like John McCain.
are you just unaware?
How would I know?
reply
You seem aware of the Ds proclamations, but not the Rs. Just making sure I understand.I think the Rs run on economic freedom, not democracy per se.
reply
I've pretty much only ever lived in Red America. I'm fairly aware of what Republicans say and do.
I don't know. Texas?
reply
Interesting you are only aware of California. But check out Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas...
reply
I agree the issues go both dem and rep, but most big cities with population centers serve as ballast in red states, like Little Rock, Memphis, etc
reply
Memphis has been stripped of all power by the Rs. They are working on Nashville now even trying to overtake the Airport authority.
reply
Yeah, - something about living in big cities that makes people act like urbanites. Or they leave.
reply
The fact that people vote democrat doesn't make it not not a democracy
It doesn't have to be a close call to be a democracy. That's like not the fucking meaning of the word
Also, there are primaries - which are very much elections, not predetermined as you make it sound.
reply
The primary process is broken
reply
Both Calafia and California most likely came from the Arabic word khalifa which means steward,[b] successor or leader. The same word in Spanish was califa, easily made into California to stand for "land of the caliph" (خلیف), or Calafia to stand for "female". Source
I know this doesn't have any relation to the objective of your post bug found it interesting so posting...
reply
Balaji Srinivasan, a tech entrepreneur and investor, wrote an article on Substack titled "California Is Not a Democracy". In the article, he argues that California's political system is not democratic, but rather a technocratic oligarchy. He claims that the state's large population, powerful unions, and wealthy tech industry have led to a system where decisions are made by a small group of elites rather than the people. He further claims that this system is detrimental to individual freedom and economic mobility.
Srinivasan's argument centers around the idea that California's system of government, which combines direct democracy (through initiatives and referendums) with representative democracy, has become unresponsive to the needs of the average citizen. He cites examples such as the state's high taxes, strict environmental regulations, and the influence of powerful unions as evidence of this. He also argues that the tech industry's dominance in the state has led to a culture of censorship and political correctness, which stifles free speech and creativity.
Srinivasan's article has been met with both praise and criticism. Some have lauded him for shedding light on the problems with California's political system, while others have criticized him for oversimplifying complex issues and promoting a narrow, libertarian worldview. Regardless of one's opinion on the article, it highlights the ongoing debates about the nature of democracy and the role of technology in shaping political systems.
reply
California Democrats are attempting to prevent a ballot measure that would repeal Proposition 47 from going to voters in November 2024. They have proposed amendments to retail theft bills that would void those bills if the Proposition 47 repeal measure is approved by voters.[5] This is seen as a tactic to discourage support for the repeal initiative backed by prosecutors, retailers, and Republicans.[6]
Proposition 47, passed in 2014, reduced certain non-violent property crimes and drug possession offenses from felonies to misdemeanors.[3] Critics argue it has led to increases in crime and drug use, while supporters say it has reduced mass incarceration and saved money for rehabilitation programs.[4] The proposed repeal measure would allow prosecutors to charge repeat offenders with felonies and impose prison sentences.[3]
Democrats claim their retail theft bill package can address concerns about Proposition 47 without needing to repeal it, while Republicans insist Proposition 47 itself must be reformed and support putting the repeal on the ballot.[6]
reply
California voters may decide on a far-reaching tax measure in the November 2024 election that would require voter approval for any new state or local taxes and tax increases. The "Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act" initiative, backed by business groups, would:
  • Mandate a two-thirds voter approval for any new or increased taxes and many fees at the state and local levels.[2][4]
  • Potentially invalidate some existing taxes if they are not re-approved by voters under the new rules.[4]
  • Restrict the state legislature's power to raise revenue through taxes.[4]
Supporters argue the measure is needed to rein in excessive taxation and provide accountability, while critics fear it could severely hamper funding for vital public services, infrastructure, and emergency response efforts.[2][4] The California Supreme Court heard arguments this week on whether to remove the initiative from the November ballot, as requested by Governor Newsom and other Democratic leaders who claim it is an unconstitutional revision of state powers.[4]
The court appears split on the issue, with some justices suggesting a decision could wait until after the election to avoid prejudging voters.[4] If the measure qualifies, it would be one of the most consequential tax initiatives in California since Proposition 13 in 1978 which limited property tax increases.[2]
reply
A shame to the Republicans
reply
a situation politique en Californie, bien qu'elle ait des aspects uniques en raison de son contexte américain et de ses spécificités culturelles et économiques, montre certains parallèles avec d'autres régions du monde où la domination politique d'un seul parti ou d'un groupe homogène peut poser des défis à la gouvernance démocratique et au développement durable.