pull down to refresh

As I watched No Country for Old Men (Coen brothers), I noticed on the Wikipedia page the following claim:
According to a study published by researchers at the Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium, in 2014, that involved studying 400 films (1915–2010) and identifying 126 fictional psychopathic characters (21 female and 105 male), Anton Chigurh in “No Country for Old Men” is the most clinically accurate portrayal of a psychopath till date.
I then went to check this article to read the following:
Original study (non-paywalled).
Among the most interesting recent and most realistic idiopathic psychopathic characters is Anton Chigurh in the 2007 Coen brothers’ film, No Country for Old Men. Anton Chigurh is a well-designed prototypical idiopathic/primary psychopath. We lack information concerning his childhood, but there are sufficient arguments and detailed information about his behavior in the film to obtain a diagnosis of active, primary, idiopathic psychopathy, incapacity for love, absence of shame or remorse, lack of psychological insight, inability to learn from past experience, cold-blooded attitude, ruthlessness, total determination, and lack of empathy. He seems to be affectively invulnerable and resistant to any form of emotion or humanity. Having read and studied Richard Kuklinski’s case, Chigurh and Kuklinski have several traits in common (20). In the case of Chigurh, the description is extreme, but we could realistically almost talk about ≪ an anti-human personality disorder ≫.
It then goes on to mention the following characters that are pretty realistic too:
Another realistic interesting example is Henry (inspired from Henry Lee Lucas) (Henry-Portrait of a Serial Killer, 1991). In this film, the main, interesting theme is the chaos and instability in the life of the psychopath, Henry’s lack of insight, a powerful lack of empathy, emotional poverty, and a well-illustrated failure to plan ahead. George Harvey is another different and interesting character found in The Lovely Bones, 2009. Harvey is more ≪adapted ≫ than Chigurh and Henry. He has a house, is socially competent and seems like ≪ the average man on the street ≫. Through the film, we learn that he is in fact an organized paraphilic SVP. Here, the false self is well illustrated. In terms of a ≪ successful psychopath ≫, Gordon Gekko from Wall Street (1987) is probably one of the most interesting, manipulative, psychopathic fictional characters to date. Manipulative psychopathic characters are increasingly appearing in films and series. Again, we observe the same process, as observed and explained before, with antisocial psychopaths. For the past few years, with the world economic crises and some high-profile trials (such as the Bernard Madoff trial), the attention of the clinicians is more focused on ≪ successful psychopaths ≫, also called corporate psychopaths by Babiak et al. (21). Films and series presenting characters such as brokers, dishonest traders, vicious lawyers, and those engaged in corporate espionage are emerging (e.g., Mad Men, The Wire) and are generally related to the global economy and international business. Again, we see a strong parallelism between what happens in our society and what happens in film.
So, my question to you:
  • Have you seen any of the above movies? Would you recommend any of them?
  • Any other recommendations on captivating psychopaths in movies that are also mentioned in the original article cited above?
Have you heard of the dark triad?
reply
I hadn't, until now. Worth the watch? Not finding many reviews...
reply
Its not a movie, its a type of test? Maybe not a test....they are three traits.
Psychopath Narcissist Machiavellian
They are not bad traits in small doses
reply
They are not bad in any dose. It depends on the person, even if you have these traits it doesnt make you into a killer.
reply
Too much is dangerous
reply
There are people eiththese traits that havent turned into bad psychopaths.
reply
Doctors Lawyers Politicians CEO
reply
Lots of ceos exhibit thesr traits.
reply
Anton Chigurh is disturbing because he is not motivated by money, he enjoys killing people
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @senf 10 Jun
Have you seen any of the above movies? Would you recommend any of them?
I would very much recommend seeing No Country for Old Men.
reply
Fully agree. That's what prompted this whole rabbit hole... Javier Bardem really is outstanding in his role.
reply
This is what the article has to say on Hannibal Lecter.
Perhaps the most famous and ≪ caricatured ≫ example of this type of psychopath is that of the cannibalistic psychiatrist Dr. Hannibal Lecter, as portrayed by Anthony Hopkins in the acclaimed, Academy Award-winning 1991 film The Silence of the Lambs. As portrayed by Hopkins and imagined by Harris (23), Lecter is an exceptionally intelligent sophisticated socialite, whose disarming charisma, erudition, civility, and wit disguise his true nature as a psychopath who murders people and makes gourmet cuisine out of their flesh. Hannibal Lecter, while the embodiment of evil, is also an extraordinarily astute clinician who can diagnose Jodie Foster’s psychological conflicts by identifying her perfume and assessing her shoes and clothing with Holmesian accuracy. He also seems to be invulnerable. Again, Dr. Lecter accumulates many personal characteristics that are not generally found in everyday clinical practice.
(emphasis mine)
Not an everyday or super-realistic psychopath it seems~~ Then again, one of the best movie characters, for sure.
reply