pull down to refresh
Unfortunately this isn't quite what the Court of Appeals did.
Rather, they ruled that it was plausible that mRNA didn't fit the definition of a vaccine for the purpose of vaccine mandates. Thus the issue can be further argued in court.
Thanks for the clarification.
Unfortunately this isn't quite what the Court of Appeals did.
Rather, they ruled that it was plausible that mRNA didn't fit the definition of a vaccine for the purpose of vaccine mandates. Thus the issue can be further argued in court.