83 sats \ 12 replies \ @chaoticalHeavy 8 Jun \ parent \ on: Fed Court of Appeals Rules mRNA are NOT Vaccines Under Traditional Definitions science
Looks like Pfizer is open to a lawsuit.
From the article:
admitted in an EU hearing
Thing is, this was public knowledge from day zero. Any competent medical professional who administered the vaccines would have known this, as the clinical trials clearly didn't even try to determine if they stopped transmission.
We should not let Pfizer solely take the blame on this. The entire medical profession is to blame.
reply
That's one of the problems. Complicity is so widespread that it's just not plausible to hold all parties accountable.
reply
Nah, it's totally possible. There aren't that many doctors and nurses out there on total, let alone when you restrict it to ones involved in vaccination programs.
You just need the political willpower to mass arrest them. El Salvador did that for ~1% of their entire population, a much bigger problem given they had many more people to arrest, and they were violent gang members.
reply
The doctor and nurse are not the main culprit.
Pfizer and Moderna are the main culprits. Plus Fauci and his cronies and crone
reply
I agree, but doctors especially participated in a massive dereliction of their professional responsibilities. I would be fine with seeing action taken against the AMA for instance, if they issued irresponsible guidance.
Ultimately, doctors are the service provider and the ones expected to use their expertise to evaluate what treatments make sense. Many of them were pushing mRNA injections despite knowing that it didn't really make sense.
reply
Good point
We should definitely sue the AMA for many reasons including a dereliction of their duty to do no harm
reply
I'm all for it, but I stand by my claim that it isn't plausible. I hope I'm wrong about that.
reply
Ultimately it would be political. It would wind up being a big voting block that no politician would want to confront.
Suing every Dr also affects all nurses and healthcare workers and hospitals in general. All those entities ultimately work under the umbrella of a "doctors orders", I don't mean that from a liability standpoint....but rather they would "support" the Doctors they work under and wouldn't permit them to be thrown under the bus as it would affect their career/profits.
reply
Yep. Great point.
reply
Moderna is a shady company always has been since inception.
They never received FDA approval for anything until COVID. Remember the initial rollout was not FDA approved. It was emergency use authorization or EUA
The mRNA shots were not tested adequately for safety
reply
This is the approach Texas is taking. They are not trying to circumvent vaccine immunity protection, they are simply going after consumer protection (ie. false advertising). In Texas this is $10,000 fine per incident. So each time vaccine shot administered....
Having said that, I do not think "vaccine immunity protection" would work in a case where there was criminal negligence. That is to say, immunity protection is not a license to intentionally kill.
reply
I think the immunity is also vulnerable because of how the trial data was manipulated and withheld.
Ultimately, all that will matter is if there’s a judge willing to take this on.
reply