I think the part that I wasn't expecting here was "you can have entanglement even if quantum theory is false."
52 sats \ 1 reply \ @south_korea_ln 5 Jun
It's kinda implied in this article, but worth emphasizing that quantum entanglement doesn't mean information can be transferred at a speed greater than the speed of light. If you are measuring the state of entagled particle B, you would still need to check the state of particle A by obtaining it through "classical" means, i.e. someone at particle A would need to inform you of its state, whose communication means are bound by the speed of light.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Jun
Exactly. I never quite understood the supposed paradox here.
Logical inference in one place about something happening in another is not the same thing as communication between the two places.
reply
42 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 4 Jun
Very interesting. Thanks for posting. Quantum physics baffles me but @Undisciplined fancies himself somewhat of a quantum physicist.
reply
71 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Jun
Indeed
https://m.stacker.news/33938
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears OP 5 Jun
Yeah, Quantum physics also baffles me, but I find it fascinating and which I could understand more of it.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 5 Jun
Me too.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BoJack 5 Jun
From a dumb peasant such as myself I think life is rendered and entanglement is just the beginning in understanding our rendering speed
reply