What do you think is encoded in the 50x as much DNA as humans?
Special cases for different situations36.4%
Junk. Useless junk.27.3%
redundancy redundancy redundancy27.3%
other9.1%
11 votes \ poll ended
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @quark 2 Jun
they don't seem 50x more complex than humans. I bet it is accumulating junk over the millions of years. But it is strange for nature to produce useless junk. If it is for redundancy and adapt to different climates and situations, it would be very cool. That would be more advanced than humans.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @zx 2 Jun
I bet 160GB is not even syncing to tip with prune=1
*edit what is Gbp? Is its not Gigabytes or pound sterling.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Nuttall 2 Jun
The large number is that aggregate of "hey, this worked, lets keep it." The lesser number is a "High Speed, Low Drag" conglomerate.
reply