I inferred it, still total nonense as I stated 

> if users didn't value the peg, why would the peg exist in the first place

justin_shocknet

I missed a word in my reply above. It should read:

just because a token is pegged to another asset, 

 users of that token expect it's issuer to act as custodians for that asset

bitcoin

Why can't you buy ecash from a Cashu mint?

Scoresby

I missed a word in my reply above. It should read:

just because a token is pegged to another asset, **doesnt mean** users of that token expect it's issuer to act as custodians for that asset

Sorry, I type poorly on a phone. 