pull down to refresh

10 sats \ 18 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 28 May \ parent \ on: Central Banks Are Destroying Our Economies econ
I have a feeling that a lot of what they’re doing is because they think the end is coming.
write
preview
21 sats \ 17 replies \ @Satosora 28 May
The end in what way?
reply
62 sats \ 16 replies \ @Hamstr 28 May
Americans aren't having children, so if a country has fewer children, you don't have growth and less debtors/slaves to keep the country running. This destroys the system, so by importing new cattle/immigrants you gain new debtors(that are born/indoctrinated) under the guise of freedom, if you've been following along with @Lux then a lot of this make sense.
Also, have you noticed they aren't even encouraging Americans to have children? In S. Korea, the government won't shut up about it. They'll even support the family that does have children after two. They'll help fund the child's education and whatever. But even then few Koreans, Japanese are having less children. Which is insane because the people in these countries are krazy smart.
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Satosora 28 May
Immigration has always been important to the USA. It is a shame we are having less children, but all developed societies end up this way. There is not enough support in the system to have many kids like in the past.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Hamstr 28 May
Well, from what I've seen in the US. Many Mexicans move to the US and live with extended families, so a typical 5room house can easily accommodate that. But the next generation of those children aren't going to want to live in extended homes. They'll want to have their own place and this has economical effects like having less children. Economics plays a huge role to if people will have children too. Afterall, we're not obligated to bare children.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 28 May
In general, they are catholic. They will keep having children. Maybe after a few generations, they will stop having as many.
reply
20 sats \ 12 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 28 May
South Korea is in an unprecedented genetic collapse, though. If the current fertility rate doesn't increase, it will be the fastest population collapse ever recorded.
Up until now, that record is held by the Native American population after first contact with European diseases.
reply
41 sats \ 8 replies \ @Hamstr 29 May
I feel like they're so many Koreans, I find this impossible unless we witness a "Spanish Influenza" like event again. Even though many people died during COVID-19, many survived too. Unless someone's got a graph of death to birth chart we can look up? @TomK
reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 29 May
There are lots of Koreans now, but the next generation will have many fewer, as will the one after.
I’m talking about inter generational population decline.
reply
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 29 May
Its happening everywhere, right?
reply
10 sats \ 4 replies \ @TomK 29 May
Sorry, but in the case of Covid I refuse the official opinion of the 'deadliest pandemic ever'
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 29 May
Me too. I think they really tried to pull the wool over everyones eyes on that one.
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @Hamstr 29 May
Was it labeled, “Deadliest pandemic ever” Really? That's a bit of a stretched. Goes to show, I'm not reading CNN, BBC or whatever.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 29 May freebie
It was labeled..."If you get on a ventilator, you have breathed your last breath because you are hooked up to a ventilator that has someone who also has covid on it". Sharing ventilators was a bad idea...
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 29 May
I dont think people died from covid....many were reported but it wasnt true. Even cancer patients died of covid, everyone who was dying during that period was labeled as a covid death.
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Satosora 28 May
South Korea and also Japan. They dont have the public works to support having children. What really bothered me in Taiwan is that they are exploiting having babies. Companies have a spa service so that they take advantage of the house sitting after childbirth. I feel it really takes away from the family structure and traditions.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @Hamstr 28 May
it is, so the state can indoctrinate the child. Thus, it doesn't belong to the family but to the "state." Who will want to have children with such a bleak future like that? The solution is to END the FED, or point some guns to those that take away freedom.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 28 May
You point the guns....then you wont exist. Its as easy as that.
reply