100 sats \ 9 replies \ @DarthCoin 6 Aug 2022 \ parent \ on: Daily discussion thread
Can you prove that what my eyes saw, is not true? No.
So STFU or didn't happen.
Speaking truth is a bitcoiner must do.
I also live under the Natural Law. Do you know what natural law is?
- Do not do harm
- Do not steal
- Do not kill
- Do not lie, stay in honor
If you don't believe what I just related about those holders, it is your problem, not mine. I mention that, not because to brag about their holdings, but to show the rest of the new users that not only Saylor is the "biggest" holder. Holding a large amount of BTC is NOT important, important is what are you doing with them. And Saylor, as many want to believe, he doesn't have the real good intentions to do. Listen all his talks and you will find out his "plans" to do with his stash. Not so good...
THIS IS A WARNING, to all people to listen carefully all words out there and don't follow blindly.
"Can you prove that what my eyes saw, is not true? No."
Ah - the religious standpoint. I guess I just need "Faith" in your outrageous claim. Your point is moot. It is not provable, nor true, and it is, frankly, ridiculous. Just to entertain your fantasy a bit more.. let's say you "personally saw" these 2-6 million bitcoin back in 2012 like you claim. There was a TOTAL SUPPLY of 8-9 million coins back then. So you saw someone who had a wallet of 2 million coins, or 25% of all bitcoins at the time? And you claimed multiple people had that many coins, meaning you personally confirmed (witnessed) 80-90% of the supply. It is verifiable (with actual signatures, unlike you) that way more than 20% of the supply at the time was in the hands of thousands of people. So, I don't believe you, and no one else here does. Please stop.
On a more serious note, I actually own 22 million bitcoin personally. Can you prove me wrong? No. So stop getting so angry at me clearly telling the truth!!!!!!!!!11111 I'm telling the truthtthh!!!!11!!!!!!11!! It's a warning to tell people that numbrber of bitcoins no matter!! im' vary smart!!!
reply
let's say you "personally saw" these 2-6 million bitcoin back in 2012 like you claim.
Read again what I wrote. I never claimed that back in 2012 I saw 6 M BTC.
This is where shitcoiners do not pay attention...
You are just a pathetic shitcoiner.
reply
I only own bitcoin. And this is what you said verbatim:
121 sats \ 22 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 Aug
Why people are so concentrated into M. Saylor?
He's just a small holder of BTC.
I know personally some (private) guys with 100x times more BTC than Saylor.
And let's not forget 2 big "public" players too: McAfee and M. Popescu. These guys are NOT dead as many will think.
Only M. Popescu have at least 2M BTC and is well alive...
------- another reply of yours ------- Yes, I know. The friend that told me in 2012 about BTC and sold me 1 BTC for beer money, he already had thousands of them from mining at home (he started in 2010). And he never stop mining and holding all these years. But he's a wise guy and stay in total privacy.
So, yes you claimed you know personally people with millions of bitcoin. Are you saying you lied? Or are you saying that you misspoke, and you meant to say thousands of bitcoin? You've made multiple contradicting claims. You apparently "know" that McAfee and Popescu have 2m bitcoin, without seeing it yourself. The more I respond to you the more I think you are just a very clever troll.
reply
so? Where I said 6 M BTC?
I only own bitcoin
Your posts do not prove it. Mostly shitcoining.
reply
I don't need to prove anything to you, didn't you say that yourself? You don't need to prove the 100x Saylor's bitcoin and I don't need to prove i'm not a shitcoiner.
Can't have your cake and eat it too, pal.
reply
How many sats are you willing to pay for continuing this ?
I have more sats than you! :)
reply
I'm not replying to prove how many sats I have, Jesus dude what is your problem? I'm replying to tell you to stop spouting lies.. (a noble cause, I think)
reply
Jesus dude what is your problem?
I don't like shitcoiners. And you are one of them.