pull down to refresh

Your assumptions are incorrect. I understand concepts like "getting paid" and "crowdfunding" perfectly well. I believe that Bitcoin's decentralized nature can challenge traditional financial systems, including those in socialist contexts. Additionally, liberalism often fails to address systemic inequalities, turning people into individualists and leaving them behind. Socialism, on the other hand, helps people and the community. With the help of Bitcoin, which is traceable and not manipulable, in a socialist environment where resources are shared to help others, it could be very beneficial.
No, you clearly don't understand. Anything, honestly. To start, the very assumption that you need Bitcoin for socialism to work implies that you distrust completely the very institutions that you want to manage everything. The fact that you can't associate A and B shows that you don't even understand socialism and have based your beliefs entirely in all of the senseless but pretty buzzwording you have been uttering.
reply
I wasn't suggesting that Bitcoin is necessary for socialism to work. It can help. That's not the same thing. These aren't just buzzwords, and I can connect ideas from A to B, C, and so on. The meaning of words is subjective; each person derives their own understanding from them. To me, these words do make sense, and I hope they will hold even more significance in the future, in various parts of the world.
reply