Not exactly an inside job, but Saudi Arabia did help us create the petrodollar.
A new filing in a lawsuit brought by the families of 9/11 victims against the government of Saudi Arabia alleges that al-Qaeda had significant, indeed decisive, state support for its attacks. Officials of the Saudi government, the plaintiffs’ attorneys contend, formed and operated a network inside the United States that provided crucial assistance to the first cohort of 9/11 hijackers to enter the country.
The 71-page document, released in redacted form earlier this month, summarizes what the plaintiffs say they’ve learned through the evidence obtained in discovery and recently declassified materials. They allege that Saudi officials—most notably Fahad al-Thumairy, an imam at a Los Angeles mosque and an accredited diplomat at Saudi Arabia’s consulate in that city, and Omar al-Bayoumi, who masqueraded as a graduate student but was identified by the FBI as an intelligence operative—were not rogue operators but rather the front end of a conspiracy that included the Saudi embassy in Washington and senior government officials in Riyadh.
Today, for most Americans, the global War on Terror has become a hazy memory from the time before Donald Trump. In Washington, policy makers avoid discussing the subject. Yet it bears remembering: It cost us $6 trillion, and that number is expected to go higher because of the long-term health-care costs for veterans. It turned the Middle East upside down, increasing the regional influence of Iran. More than 7,000 American servicemen and women died in action; 30,000 more, an extraordinary number, died by suicide. In all, more than 800,000 Iraqis, Afghans, and others, most of them civilians, perished in the war.
The term "no shit, Sherlock" comes to mind. The real question is why the Atlantic is writing this article 23 years later? Maybe because Saudi Arabia has stopped doing US bidding and no longer is the main petrodollar prop?
reply
Literally this. Graduate degree in Poli Sci here, and our entire sector of academia has been operating from this premise for two decades. I’m not sure why The Atlantic thinks a majority of Americans are too stupid to have drawn this conclusion for themselves. It sure as hell wasn’t the indigent feuding Deobandi tribes and post-Soviet invasion Afghan Mujahideen financing AQAP’s Jihadi-Reject Summer Camps. The fact that OBL and his 38 siblings are Saudi Nationals by birth—as were all but two or three of the 9/11 hijackers—has been implicit of a much more insidious state backing by the Saud Family cronies since the jump. If not for our bilateral petroleum arrangements, instead of bothering with the anachronism that was Afghanistan we would have rightfully launched a full-scale invasion of Saudi Arabia and deposed the entire Al Saud bloodline. We made them, and we can just as easily break them. American Defense Contractors have furnished their entire military establishment. If we opt to terminate those friendly benefits and sanction them back to the Stone Age, they’ll be lucky to source third-hand Soviet-era matériel. Good luck keeping your population oppressed, beholden, and subjugated without modern military technology.
reply
This is a great question. We are in the middle of shift. I am not sure what it all means but it feels real.
reply
Honestly, I thought this was a given. Didn't realize it was a conspiracy theory that Saudis were at very least complicit.
reply
Yeah, I'm sure it wasn't ALL of the "Saudis" but I thought this was pretty much accepted at this point. Maybe I'm just out of touch. I don't think most people even think about this stuff any more. It is really easy to put groups like states into one group. Truth is there are many actors with different motivations working against each other wield power. Crazy how often this is missed.
reply
I think most of the interested people on the internet knew/suspected this for awhile. The threshold of credibility for modern journalism seems to be well prepared documents presented in a trial. Lawyers are the investigative journalists now.
reply
In a way, journalism is dead. In another way it has never been more alive. We have lost the illusion of trusted authorities and must make sense out of the noise.
reply
196 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 20 May
It does have some benefit, but if the average person doesn't want to wade through the noise, they end up being led astray. We need to both lose the illusion and have good discovery/aggregation/curation of the distributed sense that's made now.
reply
Yeah, I agree with you. I think we may need to become influencers lol.
reply
This is one of the formative instances for me of the regime treating people like they're crazy for asking reasonable questions based on readily available information.
reply
Bearing in mind that The Atlantic is an institution in Intel agency run media, the timing of something like this foreshadows something
Stories like this exist to front-run a larger news cycle, and in this case likely some conveniently timed DECLAS set in motion years ago, that will result in fresh finger pointing over 9/11....
Less interesting what its saying vs why its saying it now... this fake election might be even more spicy than the fake pandemic one
reply
30,000 more, an extraordinary number, died by suicide.
Wow...
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 20 May
I hadn't seen/remembered that stat either.
reply
Truly shocking, but knowing some vets from that era also not shocking.
reply
Still not a word about the Bin laden family allowed to leave the US while all other planes were grounded. Investigating the family of the prime suspect seemed a rather sensible thing to do, turns out there was no interest in learning anything about the attacks, protecting the petrodollar and rolling out the next wave of war spending was the highest priority. War is a racket, nothing new
reply
The global War on Terror was based on a mistake.
I mean, was it a mistake? I find that highly unlikely. I think the word they should have used was "based on a lie".
reply
Hence the reason why we went to iraq, right? Oil had nothing to do with it.
reply
So...why did Saudi Arabia theoretically do this?
reply
Good question.
reply