pull down to refresh
Nearly accurate, I would think, but 100%? I couldn't tell you. But I think it would be a lot more honest than big Tech, bankers, and governments. As it could sort through data to find evidences, I suppose, no?
@Coinsreporter, I agree AI is not a replacement for writing. But to deliver certain news in a non-bias way, I don't think it's necessarily bad.
For example, China experiences earthquake 5.5 on Richie scale. 3 found dead.
^^again example
Someone going there to assess the damage is completely different from pulling from feeds
Yes, I agree. For certain news, we can accept AI.
Also because it's a fact the the media presents any news with so much bias and exaggeration these days.
right?!! you can't even get a clear description of what is inflation from news that the public has to look elsewhere for that information.
Can you say that the fast talking man is nearly accurate? If so, it's not bad to thank it! I guess.
For finding answers, I support AI. But for writing, I don't.