Despite being in its early release stages, GPT-4o is seemingly great at writing and detecting errors in code.
75 sats \ 0 replies \ @quark 19 May
I still like to code and AI helps tremendously. I am a better coder than before AI.
But I think we still need humans to check and reorganize things to make the final code if it is a large project. At least for now. Maybe I'm not using it at full potential. Maybe if I let it access the full project works better. But I'm afraid of that
reply
138 sats \ 2 replies \ @BitcoinAbhi 19 May
I totally disagree. Coding is an art and bots can't be artist.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @gmd 19 May
They're pretty darn good at artwork though...
Just remember when looking at how fast things are progressing, that these are the dumbest these AIs will ever be...
Midjourney 1.0 vs today is kind of insane.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @tomlaies 19 May
It's like book printing for authors. Tremendous productivity gain. Takes off the bulk of the quantitative challenge. But didn't remove the essence of being an author.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 19 May
It seemingly great at detecting, may be, but writing? What my devs ain't gonna like it. It's unnecessary to ask why did another coder attempted at creating such an attack at coding? But AI has been created by coders! Am I right?
reply
34 sats \ 0 replies \ @tomlaies 19 May
AI is good at detecting. AI is good at writing. AI is bad at deciding what to write.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @chaoticalHeavy 19 May
Here's the video clip of what Jensen Huang said.
reply