0 sats \ 10 replies \ @bitties OP 15 May freebie \ parent \ on: FIRST STATE PURCHASE OF BTC bitcoin
It most definitely is. This is good news for BTC though, no matter what your stance.
write
preview
96 sats \ 9 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 15 May
The title of your post is wrong
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @bitties OP 15 May
Are you trying to make an issue out of nothing? You like to comment on my posts with arguments that aren’t quite arguments. I hope you have a good day.
reply
1 sat \ 7 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 15 May
There was no argument from my side, I was merely laying out the FACTS
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @bitties OP 15 May
Yea, I tried to find anything showing it’s not the first state and all I get is more proof that it IS the first state. So please enlighten me? I am here to learn.
reply
1 sat \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 15 May
The error I pointed out isn't about being the first state. I don't know if it is, and I don't care. The error was saying that they bought bitcoin. What they bought was paper bitcoin.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @bitties OP 15 May freebie
Uh duh. We already went over that. Jesus Christ dude have a good one.
Waste of my time.
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @bitties OP 15 May
Gotcha, so you are nitpicking nothing. Just needed to be clear. Did you know that if you believe me to be wrong? Posting that fact with proof is a better response. Much more mature.
reply
1 sat \ 2 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 15 May
There's no need to get upset. Showing a bit of humility and admitting your mistake would have made you look better in the photo.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @bitties OP 15 May freebie
Being mature and posting the correction, now that would have made you look better in the photo